Goldbaum v. United States, 348 U.S. 905 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Goldbaum v. United States, 348 U.S. 905 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
91 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Franklin (innd, 1982-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Franklin
N.D. Ind. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229, 74 S.Ct. 450, 451 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954), appeal after remand, 348 U.S. 904 , 75 S.Ct. 288 , 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955); U. S. v. Howard, 506 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1975); and Downey v. Peyton, 451 F.2d 236 (4th Cir. 1971).
discussed Cited "see" Clyde Snyder v. Ira M. Coiner, Warden, West Virginia State Penitentiary (2×)
4th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beaty v. United States (4th Cir. 1954) 213 F.2d 712, 721 , vac. on other grounds, 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 ; United States v. Norman (9th Cir. 1968) 402 F.2d 73, 76 , cert. den. 397 U.S. 938 , 90 S.Ct. 949 , 25 L.Ed.2d 119 ; United States ex rel.
examined Cited "see" Fred B. Black, Jr. v. United States (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Banks v. United States, 204 F.2d 666 (8th Cir. 1953), vacated for reconsideration, 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 , aff'd 223 F.2d 884 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 986 , 76 S.Ct. 472 , 100 L.Ed. 853 (1956). 2 Form W-2 is the form filed by the employer, reporting compensation paid under circumstances where withholding is necessary.
cited Cited "see" Francis T. Proctor v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Remmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 904 , 75 S.Ct. 288 , 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955); United States v. Killian, 246 F.2d 77, 82 (7th Cir. 1957).
discussed Cited "see" Leo Elwert v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1956 · signal: see · confidence high
See Goldbaum v. United States, 9 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 74, 78 , remanded 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 , reaffirmed 9 Cir., 1955, 222 F.2d 360 . 2 .
cited Cited "see" Keith M. Beaty v. United States
4th Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James D. Harris v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also McFee v. United States, 206 F.2d 872, 876 (9 Cir. 1953), vacated, 348 U.S. 905 , 75 S.Ct. 311 , 99 L.Ed. 710 (1955) reaff’d, 221 F. 2d 807 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 53 , 100 L.Ed. 737 (1955), in which we held that where attorneys acted in the capacity of a transmitter of funds, they stood in the same position as a banker, and no confidential relationship arose.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goldbaum
v.
United States Banks v. United States McFee v. United States Brown v. United States Watts v. United States Beaty v. United States Strauch v. United States Burdick v. United States Mitchell v. United States
No. 12; No. 13; No. 15; No. 133; No. 135; No. 209; No. 215; No. 249; No. 622.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1955.
348 U.S. 905
Irvin Goldstein for petitioners in No. 12. Joseph B. Keenan, Alvin O. West and John W. Graff for petitioner in No. 13. Elden McFarland for petitioner in No. 15. Lee S. Jones and Helen R. Graft for petitioner in No. 133. Peyton Ford, Sumner M. Redstone, H. D. Reed and Frank A. Bruno for petitioner in No. 135. Llewellyn A. Luce and W. M. Nicholson for petitioner in No. 209. John J. Hooker for petitioners in No. 215. Robert M. Taylor and John C. Noonan for petitioner in No. 249. Temple W. Seay for petitioner in No. 622 (October Term, 1953)., Robert L. Stern, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Holland and Ellis N. Slack for the United States in Nos. 12, 13 and 15. With them were Meyer Rothwacks and Joseph M. Howard in No. 12, Murray L. Schwartz in No. 13, and David L. Luce and Mr. Howard in No. 15. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack, David L. Luce and Joseph M. Howard for the United States in Nos. 133, 135, 209, 215 and 249.
Black.
Cited by 48 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit;

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit; and

On petition for rehearing.

Per Curiam:

In Nos. 12, 13, 15, 133, 135, 209, 215, and 249 the petitions for certiorari are severally granted. In No. 622, October Term, 1953, the petition for rehearing is granted, the order denying certiorari, 347 U. S. 1012, is vacated, and the petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to their respective Courts of Appeals for consideration in the light of Holland v. United States, 348 U. S. 121; Friedberg v. United States, 348 U. S. 142; Smith v. United States, [*906] 348 U. S. 147; and United States v. Calderon, 348 U. S. 160, decided by this Court December 6, 1954.

Irvin Goldstein for petitioners in No. 12. Joseph B. Keenan, Alvin O. West and John W. Graff for petitioner in No. 13. Elden McFarland for petitioner in No. 15. Lee S. Jones and Helen R. Graft for petitioner in No. 133. Peyton Ford, Sumner M. Redstone, H. D. Reed and Frank A. Bruno for petitioner in No. 135. Llewellyn A. Luce and W. M. Nicholson for petitioner in No. 209. John J. Hooker for petitioners in No. 215. Robert M. Taylor and John C. Noonan for petitioner in No. 249. Temple W. Seay for petitioner in No. 622 (October Term, 1953). Robert L. Stern, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Holland and Ellis N. Slack for the United States in Nos. 12, 13 and 15. With them were Meyer Rothwacks and Joseph M. Howard in No. 12, Murray L. Schwartz in No. 13, and David L. Luce and Mr. Howard in No. 15. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack, David L. Luce and Joseph M. Howard for the United States in Nos. 133, 135, 209, 215 and 249.

We have not considered the merits of these cases, nor have we determined their relation to our recent opinions, supra, believing that re-examination by the Courts of Appeals is desirable even in those cases remotely involving the principles laid down in the net worth decisions.

Mr. Justice Black dissents.

Reported below: No. 12, 204 F. 2d 74; No. 13, 204 F. 2d 666; No. 15, 206 F. 2d 872; No. 133, 209 F. 2d 260; No. 135, 212 F. 2d 275; No. 209, 213 F. 2d 712; No. 215, 213 F. 2d 805; No. 249, 214 F. 2d 768; No. 622 (October Term, 1953), 208 F. 2d 854.