green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Lee C. Martin v. Dennis M. Luther, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, Respondents
But see Schiffman v. Wilkinson, 216 F.2d 589, 591 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 916 , 75 S.Ct. 299 , 99 L.Ed. 719 (1955).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hehl v. Chippewa & Red Cedar Valley Carpenters' District Council
We do not agree.” Certiorari was denied (1955), 348 U. S. 917 , 75 Sup. Ct. 300, 99 L.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hehl v. CHIPPEWA, ETC., DISTRICT COUNCIL
We do not agree." Certiorari was denied (1955), 348 U. S. 917 , 75 Sup. Ct. 300, 99 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Renee Decuir v. U.S. Parole Commission
See Schiffman v. Wilkinson, 216 F.2d 589, 591 (9th Cir.1954), cert. denied, *1024 348 U.S. 916 , 75 S.Ct. 299 , 99 L.Ed. 719 (1955).
cited
Cited "see"
William Gabriel Lepera v. United States
See Schiffman v. Wilkinson, 216 F.2d 589 , 590 n.1 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 916 , 75 S.Ct. 299 , 99 L.Ed. 719 (1955).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Pease Oil Company
See N.L.R.B. v. Daboll, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 143 , 144, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 917 , 75 S.Ct. 299 , 99 L.Ed. 719 ; N.L.R.B. v. W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. E. F. Shuck Construction Co., Inc., the Associated General Contractors of America, Seattle Chapter, Inc., the Seattle Construction Council and Hod Carriers' Building and Common Laborers' Union Local No. 242, Afl, Associated General Contractors of America, Seattle Chapter, Inc., and Its Affiliate Seattle Construction Council v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., N.L.R.B. v. Daboll, 9 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 143 , certiorari denied 1955, 348 U.S. 917 , 75 S.Ct. 299 , 99 L.Ed. 719 . 8 Concerning the first provision of the order, respondent argues that it is not an employer within the meaning of the Act, and therefore that the Board was without power to enter an order against it. 9 There is no doubt that an employer's association such as the respondent which negotiates collective bargaining contracts on behalf of its members who engage in interstate commerce is an employer for the purpose of enabling the Board to order it not to maintain a provis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bailey
v.
Blalock, Superintendent, Southwestern State Hospital
v.
Blalock, Superintendent, Southwestern State Hospital
No. 133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1955.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.