Kaplow v. Reinfeld, 352 U.S. 844 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Kaplow v. Reinfeld, 352 U.S. 844 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible in damages for any overt act or acts.”
62 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pereira v. Binet (In Re Harvard Knitwear, Inc.) (nyeb, 1993-04-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Pereira v. Binet (In Re Harvard Knitwear, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible in damages for any overt act or acts.
discussed Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Missouri Savings Association v. Home Savings of America
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248, 256 (2d Cir.) (absent express legislative intent, repeal of prohibition cannot validate illegal contract to manufacture and distribute liquor), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Charles Askew v. Sgt. Millerd
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Simpson v. Weeks, 570 F.2d at 243 (“The charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible for any overt act or acts.”) (emphasis added) (quoting Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Korn v. Merrill
S.D.N.Y. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956) ; Saunders v. National Basketball Ass’n, 348 F.Supp. 649, 652-53 (N.D.Ill.1972) ; Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. The Helen Shop, Inc., 235 F.Supp. 640, 644 (S.D.N.Y.1964) ; Skouras Theatres Corp. v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp., 193 F.Supp. 401, 405-06 (S.D.N.Y.1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kaplow
v.
Reinfeld, doing business as Bronfman Interests and Browne-Vintners Co., Inc.
No. 187.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
352 U.S. 844
Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner. Theodore Kiendl and William R. Meagher for Reinfeld et al., and Lowell Wadmond and Thomas Kiernan for Bronfman et ah, respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Reed took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.