Keith L. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co., a Corp., 353 U.S. 925 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Keith L. Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co., a Corp., 353 U.S. 925 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
145 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Deen (tex, 1958-11-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Deen
Tex. · 1958 · confidence medium
By our opinion delivered May 7, 1958, ( 158 Texas 466 , 312 S.W. 2d 933 ) in this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, we reversed the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals ( 306 S.W. 2d 171 , which in reliance upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States in this same cause ( 353 U.S. 925 ) [77 Sup. Ct. 715, 1 L.
cited Cited "see" Holland Industries, Inc. v. Division of Transportation of the State
Mo. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway, 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 (1957).
discussed Cited "see" Rutland Railway Corp. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
D. Vt. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River and Indiana Railroad Company, 1957, 353 U.S. 30 , 77 S.Ct. 635 , 1 L.Ed.2d 622 , and Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, 1957, 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 722 .
cited Cited "see" Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
9th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co., 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 . .
discussed Cited "see" Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company v. Brotherhood Of Locomotive Firemen And Enginemen
9th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manion v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co., 353 U.S. 927 , 77 S.Ct. 706 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 11 See Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. New York Central Railroad Co., 6 Cir., 246 F.2d 114 ; Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Order of Railroad Telegraphers, 7 Cir., 264 F.2d 254
cited Cited "see" Matter of the Application of Robert Cameron for an Alternative Writ of Mandamus
9th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Simpson v. Teets, 353 U.S. 926 , 77 S. Ct. 720 , 1 L.Ed.2d 722 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jones v. United States (2×)
E.D. Tenn. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although at one time it was held that the Court has no jurisdiction in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to hold a hearing to determine the movant’s insanity or mental competence at time of trial, absent a certificate by the bureau of prisons that there was probable cause to believe that he was insane or mentally incompetent at that time, Hoskins v. United States, C.A.6th (1957), 251 F.2d 51 ; see also Thomas v. United States, C.A.6th (1956), 234 F.2d 815 , certiorari denied (1957), 352 U.S. 1006 , 77 S.Ct. 568 , 1 L.Ed.2d 551 , rehearing denied (1957), 353 U.S. 925 , 77 S.Ct. 683 , 1 L.E…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Keith L. Manion
v.
Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, a Corporation
702.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 8, 1957.
353 U.S. 925
Published

353 U.S. 927

77 S.Ct. 706

1 L.Ed.2d 722

Keith L. MANION et al., Petitioners,
v.
KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 702.

Decided April 8, 1957.

Messrs. Ralph M. Jones, Kansas City, Mo., Charles B. Blackmar, Russell B. Day and Harold C. Heiss, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.

Mr. Horace F. Blackwell, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Kansas City Court of Appeals of Missouri must be vacated in the light of our decision in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River and Indiana R. Co., 353 U.S. 30, 77 S.Ct. 635, because the dispute here is not pending before the National Railroad Adjustment Board. The cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision and without prejudice to the power of the Court of Appeals to reinstate its judgment if the dispute is submitted to the Adjustment Board by either party within a reasonable time.

2

Judgment vacated and cause remanded.