Davis v. Schneckloth, 353 U.S. 941 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Davis v. Schneckloth, 353 U.S. 941 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
126 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jose Cepeda Mafnas, Also Known as Joseph Cepeda Mafnas (ca9, 1983-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose Cepeda Mafnas, Also Known as Joseph Cepeda Mafnas (2×)
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jakalski, 237 F.2d 503 (7th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957); see also White v. United States, 85 F.2d 268 (D.C.Cir.1936) (money taken from messenger).
discussed Cited "see" Colin F. MacCollom v. United States (2×)
9th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See MaGee v. Nelson, 455 F.2d 275, 276 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1070 , 92 S.Ct. 1517 , 31 L.Ed.2d 802 (1972). 53 In Taylor v. United States, 238 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957), we denied a trial transcript in a section 2255 case.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John William Marx and William Frederick Shriver (2×)
10th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jakalski, 237 F.2d 503 (7th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 ; Rumfelt v. United States, 445 F.2d 134 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 853 , 92 S.Ct. 92 , 30 L.Ed.2d 94 .
discussed Cited "see" Joseph Jakalski v. Attorney General of the United States, and J. T. Willingham, Warden (2×)
7th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jakalski, 237 F.2d 503 (7th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957).
cited Cited "see" Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
5th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitaker Cable Corp. v. FTC (7 Cir. 1956) 239 F.2d 253 , cert. denied 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 813 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957); E.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Morton Sobell (2×)
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Taylor v. United States, 238 F.2d 409, 411 (9 Cir., 1956), cert. denied 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nicholas J. Nardiello, Jr., United States of America v. Alfred Salerno
3rd Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Allard, 240 F.2d 840 (3 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939 , 77 S.Ct. 814 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957); United States v. Giuliano, 263 F.2d 582 (3 Cir. 1959), in which this court followed the decision of the Supreme Court in the Holland case.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Allard, 240 F.2d 840 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 939 , 77 S.Ct. 814 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 (1957).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Noller (2×)
Mont. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
The handling of the defense by counsel of the accused’s own choice will not be declared inadequate except in those rare cases where his counsel displays such a lack of diligence and competence as to reduce the trial to a 'farce or a sham.’ Lunce v. Overlade, 7 Cir., [1957], 244 F.2d 108, 110 , [ 74 A.L.R.2d 1384 ]; see also Taylor v. United States, 9 Cir. [1956], 238 F.2d 409, 413-414 , certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 ; United States ex rel.
cited Cited "see, e.g." City of Montgomery, Alabama v. Georgia Theresa Gilmore
5th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Avery v. Wichita Independent School Dist., 5 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 230 , certiorari denied 353 U.S. 938 , 77 S.Ct. 816 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 . 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Hollins (2×)
Cal. Ct. App. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
(U. S. Const., 14th Amend., §1.) The handling of the defense by counsel of the accused’s own choice will not be declared inadequate except in those rare cases where his counsel displays such a lack of diligence and competence as to reduce the trial to a ‘farce or a sham.’ (Lunce v. Overlade [7th Cir.], 244 F.2d 108, 110 ; see also Taylor v. United States [9th Cir.], 238 F.2d 409, 413-414 , cert, denied, 353 U. S. 938 [ 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 ]; United States ex rel.
examined Cited "see, e.g." People v. Wein (4×)
Cal. · 1958 · signal: see also · confidence low
(U.S. Const., 14th Amend., § 1.) The handling of the defense by counsel of the accused's own choice will not be declared inadequate except in those rare cases where his counsel displays such a lack of diligence and competence as to reduce the trial to a "farce or a sham." ( Lunce v. Overlade [7th Cir.], 244 F.2d 108, 110 ; see also Taylor v. United States [9th Cir.], 238 F.2d 409, 413-414 , cert. denied, 353 U.S. 938 [ 77 S.Ct. 817 , 1 L.Ed.2d 761 ]; United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Davis
v.
Schneckloth, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
No. 477.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1957.
353 U.S. 941
Petitioner pro se. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Published

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.