green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…because the unknown in the case was whether x ingraham, the probative worth of this evidence far outstripped any unfairly prejudicial effect.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Stevenson v. State
But see United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 237 (1st Cir.1987) (describing bail hearings as “a fundamentally different breed of cat” from suppression hearings in that the accused’s bail rights are not so contingent on his ability to speak without fear of the future use of his testimony that he must be granted a blanket immunity from use of all statements made during an initial hearing, particularly as the information may in large part be concerned with the accused’s employment record, family status, ties to the community, and information about the charged crime can usually be obta…
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Moeller
(2×)
because the unknown in the case was whether x ingraham, the probative worth of this evidence far outstripped any unfairly prejudicial effect.
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kevin F. O’BRIEN, Defendant, Appellant
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vavlitis
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marco A. Echeverri
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andres Gabriel Bello-Perez, A/K/A Garby
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 236 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988) (authentication of telephone call and anonymous letters based on caller-author’s “peculiar obsession with [and approach to] the same obscure litigation,” amounting to an idiosyncratic “signature”); see also United *672 States v. McMahon, 938 F.2d 1501, 1508-09 (1st Cir.1991) (authentication of unsigned note based on circumstantial indicia of authorship); United States v. Newton, 891 F.2d 944, 947 (1st Cir.1989) (authentication of unsigned document bas…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Castro-Lara, United States of America v. Abraham Objio Sarraff
See generally United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987) (“The law is not so struthious as to compel a criminal jury to ignore that which is perfectly obvious.”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shmuel David, United States of America v. Jaime Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Amparo Toro Aristizibal, United States of America v. Yehuda Yarden
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Cherry
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987) ("The reviewing court will examine only those contentions that are based on newly raised questions of law, untainted by factual ambiguity.”’) (quoting United States v. McCabe, 720 F.2d 951, 955 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Frg Ventures, Inc., Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Robert F. Mongillo, Veranda Beach Club Limited Partnership v. Western Surety Co., Faneuil Hall Capital Group, Inc.
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 24 Mongillo also urges that the evidence's probative value was overwhelmed by its unduly prejudicial effect.
cited
Cited "see"
Veranda Beach Club Ltd. Partnership v. Western Surety Co.
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Nolasco
(2×)
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 646 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433, 442-43 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); Murphy v. Holland, 776 F.2d 470, 475 (4th Cir.1985) (term has “self-evident meaning comprehensible to the lay juror”), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1138 , 106 S.Ct. 1787 , 90 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Noel O. Murchu, A/K/A Noel Murphy v. United States
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 648 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis E. Devin
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 649 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Hemmer, 729 F.2d 10, 13-14 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1218 , 104 S.Ct. 2666 , 81 L.Ed.2d 371 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald William Pelton, United States of America v. Ronald William Pelton
See United States v. Pelton, 835 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3789 (U.S. May 16, 1988) (No. 87-6433).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino
See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Patrick Doran
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1478-79 (7th Cir.1987) (refusing to impose presumption), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Lane, 815 F.2d at 878-79 (same); Mays, 738 F.2d at 1190 (same); United States v. Ruppel, 724 F.2d 507, 508 (5th Cir.1984) (same); United States v. Motley, 655 F.2d 186, 188-89 (9th Cir.1981); (imposing presumption); United States v. Jamison, 505 F.2d 407, 413-17 (D.C.Cir.1974) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Gaddis and Barnetta Gaddis
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1472 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Mayo, 721 F.2d 1084, 1088 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Johnston
(2×)
See United States v. Angulo, 864 F.2d 504, 508 (7th Cir.1988) (quoting United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988)); United States v. Moya, 721 F.2d 606, 610 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037 , 104 S.Ct. 1312 , 79 L.Ed.2d 709 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Blanca Garcia-Rosa, United States of America v. Pedro Soto-Alvarez, A/K/A Junior, United States of America v. Angel Rivera-Feliciano, A/K/A Junior Azuquita, United States of America v. Victor Carrera-Perez, A/K/A Paye, United States of America v. Eduardo Rivera-Ortiz, United States of America v. Jose Heredia Nieves, A/K/A Checo El Perro
We have previously required the common presence of "some highly distinctive quality." United States v. Pisari, 636 F.2d 855, 859 (1st Cir.1981); accord United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 232-33 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); see United States v. Lail, 846 F.2d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Neary, 733 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Silva, 580 F.2d 144, 148 (5th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Rosa
We have previously required the common presence of “some highly distinctive quality.” United States v. Pisan, 636 F.2d 855, 859 (1st Cir.1981); accord United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 232-33 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); see United States v. Lail, 846 F.2d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Neary, 733 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir.1984); United States v. Silva, 580 F.2d 144,148 (5th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Rooney
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1475 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando Estevez
See United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Abayomi, 820 F.2d at 906 ; Perry, 747 F.2d at 1169 ; Xheka, 704 F.2d at 988-89 ; Quintana, 508 F.2d at 880 ; United States v. Baker, 499 F.2d 845, 848 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1071 , 95 S.Ct. 659 , 42 L.Ed.2d 667 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
(2×)
See also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 236-7 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). [¶ 22.] The trial court also gave the appropriate cautionary instruction setting forth the limited purpose for which the evidence was admitted.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chamley
(2×)
See also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 237 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). [¶ 66.] There was substantial legitimate value in the 404(b) testimony to establish intent and to negate Chamley's claims that he did not commit the charged acts.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Velazquez Rotger
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 ___ ____ _____________ ________ F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , _____ ______ 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez Pena
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DeMasi
As we have noted before, “[i]n the last analysis, criminal juries are not expected to ignore what is perfectly obvious.” Echeverri, 982 F.2d at 679 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 10 DeMasi, Martel, and Papa’s sufficiency challenges need detain us only briefly.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. De Masi
As we have noted before, "[i]n the last analysis, criminal juries are not expected to ignore what is perfectly obvious." Echeverri, 982 F.2d at 679 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). 10 32 DeMasi, Martel, and Papa's sufficiency challenges need detain us only briefly.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butler v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 646 (1st Cir.1987) ("an instruction which uses the words reasonable doubt without further definition adequately apprises the jury of the proper burden of proof”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); Murphy v. Holland, 776 F.2d 470, 475 (4th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 475 U.S. 1138 , 106 S.Ct. 1787 , 90 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986) ("To protect the accused’s due process rights and avoid supplying the grounds for unnecessary constitutional challenges, the wisest choice for trial courts to take is to avoid …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jesus Rosalez-Cortez
We may overturn a verdict “[o]nly when the record contains no evidence, regardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Teague, 956 F.2d 1427, 1433 (7th Cir.1992); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d. 1469, 1473 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foreman v. United States
The judge also defined it as “such a doubt as would cause a reasonable person to hesitate or pause in the graver or more important transactions of life,” an instruction approved by the Supreme Court in Holland, 348 U.S. at 140 , 75 5.Ct. at 138; see also Bishop v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 132, 137-38 , 107 F.2d 297, 303 (1939) (citations omitted). 6 Additionally, reflecting the fact that to a large extent “[t]he term reasonable doubt ... has a self-evident meaning comprehensible to the lay juror,” United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 645 (1st Cir.1987) (citation omitted), ce rt. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Sutton
See Fed.R.Evid. 614(b) (authorizing trial judge to interrogate witnesses); see also United States v. Olmstead, 832 F.2d 642, 648 (1st Cir.1987) (discussing extent of district court’s discretion to question a witness in a criminal jury trial), cert, denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1739 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez Molina
See Vargas, 945 F.2d at 429 ; Smith, 680 F.2d at 260 ; see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 240 (1st Cir.1987) (“The law is not so struthious as to compel a criminal jury to ignore that which is perfectly obvious.”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benitez, Appeal of Alfredo Peralta-Matos
“Only if serious injustice was inflicted upon a defendant, or if he was convicted in a manner inconsistent with fairness and integrity of judicial proceedings, will we exercise our power under the plain error rule.” United States v. Bryant, 480 F.2d 785 , 790 n. 3 (2d Cir.1973) (citing United States v. Atkinson, 297 U.S. 157, 160 , 56 S.Ct. 391, 392 , 80 L.Ed. 555 (1936)); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987) (“plain error is an error resulting in ‘an actual miscarriage of justice, which implies the conviction of one who but for the error would have been…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy Ray McDowell Jr.
See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (articulating standard); see also United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 239-40 (1st Cir.1987) (evidence need not preclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence so long as “a rational jury could look objectively at the proof and supportably conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant’s guilt had been established”), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sam Paiz, Douglas Rector, Dick Selby, Leann Cooper, Joe Rector, Barbara Allen, and Tim Rector
They assert that our review *1019 of its decision should turn on the following question: “Did the evidence at trial show the occurrence of one overall conspiracy, as charged in the indictment, or the occurrence of multiple, narrower, conspiracies?” If we were to tackle this question we would start with the definition of conspiracy: A conspiracy is “a combination or confederation between two or more people formed for the purpose of committing by their joint efforts, a criminal act,” United States v. Mayo, 721 F.2d 1084, 1088 (7th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 146…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac Dweck
“A court reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence must uphold a conviction if, ‘after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” United States v. Hammond, 826 F.2d 577, 579 (7th Cir.1987) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (emphasis in original)); see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1472 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fausto D. Ruiz
See, e.g., United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009 , 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David Rash
See, e.g., United States v. Ingraham, 832 F.2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913 , 108 S.Ct. 259 , 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glenda Blanton and Gary Cree
See, e.g., United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469 , 1472 & n. 1 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988) and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick J. Carroll
A plain error is one that results in “an actual miscarriage of justice,” United States v. Silverstein, 732 F.2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111 , 105 S.Ct. 792 , 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985), such that the defendant “probably would have been acquitted but for the erroneously admitted evidence.” Wynn, 845 F.2d at 1443 ; see also United States v. Whaley, 830 F.2d 1469, 1476 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1738 , 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Sblendorio, 830 F.2d 1382, 1388 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1034 , 98 L.Ed.2d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whaley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 87-6234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: South Dakota Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.