Harte-Hanks Commc'ns, Inc. v. Connaughton, 488 U.S. 907 (1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Harte-Hanks Commc'ns, Inc. v. Connaughton, 488 U.S. 907 (1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Holt v. Commonwealth (ky, 2007-04-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Holt v. Commonwealth (2×)
Ky. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stanford v. Commonwealth, 734 S.W.2d 781, 787 (Ky.1987), order amended, 488 U.S. 906 , 109 S.Ct. 256 , 102 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), and judgment affirmed, 492 *741 U.S. 361, 109 S.Ct. 2969 , 106 L.Ed.2d 306 (1989) (admission of codefendant's redacted confession which implicated the defendant as his accomplice was harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt because of the presence of overwhelming evidence).
cited Cited "see" James Patrick Price v. Thomas H. Brittain, Jr.
5th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connaughton v. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc., 842 F.2d 825 (6th Cir.1988), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
“A finding is ‘clearly erroneous’ when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 499 , 104 S.Ct. 1949, 1959 , 80 L.Ed.2d 502 (1984) (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed.2d 746 (1948)); accord Connaughton v. Harte Hanks Communications, Inc., 842 F.2d 825, 829 (6th Cir.1988), petition for cert. granted, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L…
discussed Cited "see" American Postal Workers Union, Columbus Area Local Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: accord · confidence high
"A finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 499 , 104 S.Ct. 1949, 1959 , 80 L.Ed.2d 502 (1984) (quoting United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed.2d 746 (1948)); accord Connaughton v. Harte Hanks Communications, Inc., 842 F.2d 825, 829 (6th Cir.1988), petition for cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 257 , 102 L.Ed.2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc.
v.
Connaughton
No. 88-10.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1988.
488 U.S. 907
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.