green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig B. Prince
See United States v. Washington, 852 F.2d 803, 804-05 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Romulo Balladares Ortiz
See United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1367 (9th Cir.1987) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 (1988); United States v. Adamson, 700 F.2d 953 , 957 n. 5 (5th Cir.1983) ("courts almost uniformly have judicially imposed the element of intent to injure or defraud;" omitted from statute by oversight), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 833 (1983). 12 The trial court's jury instruction on misapplication of bank funds misstated the law because it did not include an element of the offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lawson
See United States v. Washington, 852 F.2d 803 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 512 , 102 L.Ed.2d 547 (1988); United States v. Malik, 680 F.2d 1162 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Dumbrofsky, 581 F.2d 208 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffries
See United States v. Washington, 852 F.2d 803, 804-805 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 512 , 102 L.Ed.2d 547 (1988); United States v. Malik, 680 F.2d 1162, 1165 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Dubrofsky, 581 F.2d 208, 213 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bybee
See United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1376 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988); United States v. Curtis, 782 F.2d 593, 599 (6th Cir.1986) 5 The Statutory Interpretation makes clear that its broader definition of forward contracts applies only to "transactions entered into for commercial purposes related to the business of a producer, processor, fabricator, refiner or merchandiser, who may wish to purchase or sell a commodity for deferred shipment or delivery in connection with the conduct of its business." Statutory Interpretation, 55 Fed.Re…
cited
Cited "see"
Krommenhoek v. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. (In re Bybee)
See United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1376 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988); United States v. Curtis, 782 F.2d 593, 599 (6th Cir.1986). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Loftin
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1376 (9th Cir.1987) (affirming district court’s decision both to excuse juror who told co-worker that he thought “[defendants] were buried” and to question each remaining juror to ensure, among other things, that excused juror had not tainted them), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Roy ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant
“The fifth amendment privilege is not ordinarily self-executing and must be affirmatively claimed by a person whenever self-incrimination is threatened.” United States v. Jenkins, 785 F.2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir.1986) (citing Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420, 429 , 104 S.Ct. 1136, 1143 , 79 L.Ed.2d 409 (1984)); see also United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1374 (9th Cir.1987) (“The defendant’s failure to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination waives a later claim of privilege.”), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler
(2×)
Compare United States v. Ivic, supra, and United States v. Flynn, 852 F. 2d 1045, 1052 (CA8), ("For purposes of RICO, an enterprise must be directed toward an economic goal"), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 974 (1988), with Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagle, 868 F. 2d 1342 (CA3) (because the predicate offense does not require economic motive, RICO requires no additional economic motive), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 901 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darryl Freeman, Tyrone Netters
See National Org. for Women v. Scheidler, 968 F.2d 612 , 614, 625-30 (7th Cir.1992), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2958 , 125 L.Ed.2d 659 (1993); United States v. Ivic, 700 F.2d 51, 58-65 (2d Cir.1983); see also United States v. Flynn, 852 F.2d 1045, 1052 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 511 , 102 L.Ed.2d 546 (1988); compare Northeast Women’s Center v. McMonagle, 868 F.2d 1342 , 1349-50 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 901 , 110 S.Ct. 261 , 107 L.Ed.2d 210 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth Eugene Haddock
See, e.g., United States v. Unruh, 855 F.2d 1363, 1369-70 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 513 , 102 L.Ed.2d 548 (1988); United States v. Steffen, 641 F.2d 591, 596 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 943 , 101 S.Ct. 3091 , 69 L.Ed.2d 959 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Aaron
It was equally reasonable to infer that additional quantities of marihuana would be present at the Lyker apartment, since it was apparently being used as a base of operation by large-scale marihuana traffickers (see, United States v Dubrofsky, 581 F2d 208, 213; see also, United States v Washington, 852 F2d 803, cert denied 488 US 974 ; United States v Kar Sing Lau, 711 F Supp 40, 41-42 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Brundidge
(2×)
In such cases "manifestations of retained expectations of privacy by the absent person could [not] be stronger, [n]or the indications of assumed risks of third person permission to inspect, lower." United States v. Block, 590 F.2d 535, 541 (4th Cir.1978) (mother's authority to consent to search of son's room did not extend to a search of a locked footlocker in room); see also United States v. Padron, 657 F.Supp. 840 (D.Del.1987), aff'd without op. sub nom., United States v. Rubio, 857 F.2d 1466 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 974 , 109 S.Ct. 512 , 102 L.Ed.2d 547 (1988) (authority of dri…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5778.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1988.
488 U.S. 974
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.