green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement.”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Airline Pilots Ass'n, International (In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.)
section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Michigan-Wisconsin Transportation Co.
Relying upon United Steel Workers of America v. Unimet Corp. (In re Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 *632 (1988) and the legislatively reversed NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1983), TCU next argues that § 1113 requires a trustee to make all payments under the collective bargaining agreement until it is rejected, notwithstanding the limitations imposed upon the payment of administrative expenses in 11 U.S.C. § 503 (b).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Regent
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742 (D.C.1988) (finding disbarment appropriate where respondent failed to disclose material facts on his application for the Maryland Bar), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , *43 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); accord, In re Webster, 661 A.2d 144 (D.C.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Webster
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Robertson
(2×)
See In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988); In re Evans, 533 A.2d 243, 244 (D.C.1987). .
cited
Cited "see"
Journeymen Plasterers Protective & Benevolent Society Local No. 5 v. Energy Insulation, Inc. (In Re Energy Insulation, Inc.)
See In re Unimet Corp., 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); 130 Cong.Rec. § 8898 (daily ed June 29, 1984) (statement of Sen.
discussed
Cited "see"
General Electric Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.
(2×)
See Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc., 839 F.2d 1544, 1552 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); Hottel Corp. v. Seaman Corp., 833 F.2d 1570, 1572 (Fed.Cir.1987). 18 When the delay exceeds six years, the burden of rebutting the presumption shifts to the patentee who must prove (1) the existence of an excuse for the delay, and (2) that the excuse is reasonable.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Certified Air Technologies, Inc.
Compare *362 United Steelworkers of Am. v. Unimet Corp. (In re Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879, 884 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988) (stating that § 1113 “unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement”), with Adventure Res., Inc. v. Holland, 137 F.3d 786 , 797 (4th Cir.1998) (holding that § 1113(f) does not su-percede the priorities embodied in § 507), Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. Shugrue (In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.), 22 F.3d 403, 406 (2nd Cir.1994) (stating that…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Family Snacks Inc.
See N.L.R.B. v. Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 526 , 104 S.Ct. 1188, 1196 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984); See also Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust Funds for California v. Robertson (In re Rufener Construction, Inc.), 53 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that section 1113 is not applicable in a Chapter 7 proceeding). 19 . 11 U.S.C. § 365 (a). 20 . 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Goffe
See, e.g., In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.) (failure to disclose material information on Maryland Bar application warrants reciprocal disbarment where such misconduct would incur similar discipline if it occurred in the District of Columbia), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988).” Id. at 421.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Garner
See, e.g., In re Gilbert, 538 A.2d 742, 746 (D.C.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 56 (1988) (failure to disclose material information on Maryland Bar application warrants reciprocal disbarment where such misconduct would incur similar discipline if it occurred in the District of Columbia).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Almac's Inc.
See, e.g., United Steelworkers v. Unimet Corp. (In Unimet Corp.), 842 F.2d 879 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988); In re Arlene’s Sportswear, Inc., 140 B.R. 25 (Bankr.D.Mass.1992); In re Golden Distribs., Ltd., 134 B.R. 760 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1991), aff 'd 152 B.R. 35 (S.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Prods., 839 F.2d 1544 , 5 USPQ2d 1779 (Fed.Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 80 , 102 L.Ed.2d 57 (1988). 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jamesbury Corp.
v.
Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
v.
Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
No. 87-2117.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.