green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.4 score
“regulations reasonably adapted to the administration of a congressional act, and not inconsistent with any statute, have 'the force and effect of law”
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Woods Psychiatric Institute v. United States
(2×)
regulations reasonably adapted to the administration of a congressional act, and not inconsistent with any statute, have 'the force and effect of law
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lockheed Martin Corp. v. United States
Ct. 444, 11 L.Ed.2d 314 (1963) (to have force and effect of law, regulation cannot be inconsistent with any statute).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Longview Crop Insurance Agency v. United States
Ct. 444, 11 L.Ed.2d 314 (1963), NACIA presents an alternative argument that even if the procedures were not incorporated by reference into the contract, they must, as a matter of law, be read into the contract.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oxy USA, Inc. v. United States
Here, the parties disagree whether these exceptions prevent the Avgas Contract and ROW Agreement assignments from Cities Service to Oxy and Citgo in their present forms. “[T]he Government, if it chooses to do so, may recognize an assignment.” Id. (citing Maffia v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 198, 203 (1958)); see also Christian & Assoc. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 1 , 10, cert denied, 375 U.S. 954 (1963)).
G. L. Christian & Associates
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 538.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1963.
Gilbert A. Cuneo, Norman R. Crozier, Jr., Chester H. Johnson, William L. Hillyer, Wilson Johnston, Eldon H. Crowell and Ashley Sellers for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for the United States. Travis Brown for Associated General Contractors of America, and John B. Olverson and Mark E. Richardson for Electronic Industries Association, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (2)
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.