green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“the section requires only 'some' causal connection between the alleged communication and the sale, 'even if not "decisive”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.
the section requires only 'some' causal connection between the alleged communication and the sale, 'even if not "decisive
cited
Cited "see"
ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC v. Paul
See Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 365 (2d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. v. Thompson
See Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 365 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance Co., 798 F.2d 38, 44 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 948 , 107 S.Ct. 1608 , 94 L.Ed.2d 794 (1987); Zdanok v. Glidden Co., Durkee Famous Foods Division, 327 F.2d 944, 955 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 934 , 84 S.Ct. 1338 , 12 L.Ed.2d 298 (1964); see generally Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 326 n. 5, 99 S.Ct. 645 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 27 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard (Ted) Furkin
See United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2447 , 124 L.Ed.2d 664 (1993) (holding that extent and egregious nature of obstruction of justice can support an upward departure); United States v. Baez, 944 F.2d 88 (2d Cir.1991) (same); United States v. Wade, 931 F.2d 300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 888 , 112 S.Ct. 247 , 116 L.Ed.2d 202 (1991) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roosevelt D. Vallery
See United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032, 1036 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2447 , 124 L.Ed.2d 664 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roosevelt Vallery
See United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032, 1036 (8th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2447 , 124 L.Ed.2d 664 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rostoff
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529 , 535 n. 12 (9th Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Penrod v. Zavaras
See Jantz v. Muci, 976 F.2d 623, 627 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colony at Holbrook, Inc. v. Strata G.C., Inc.
See Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 368-69 (2d Cir.1992) (affirming verdict in favor of plaintiff on RICO claim where predicate acts spanned two years and erroneous instruction was harmless), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); Kuczynski v. Ragen Corp., 732 F.Supp. 378, 386 (S.D.N.Y.1989) (continuity established where predicate acts occurred over period of six years as part of single fraudulent scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sharon Mabel Day, United States of America v. Thomas H. Hutchens
See United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 533 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that restitution can only be ordered for acts that were necessary predicate to scheme for which defendants convicted), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.
See Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F. 2d 350, 360-361 (CA2 1992), cert. denied, 508 U. S. 952 (1993); Haralson v. E.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Glaxosmithkline
Finality ‘may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason for permitting it to be litigated again.’ ” In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564, 569 (3d Cir.1991) (quoting Dyndul v. Dyndul, 620 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir.1980)); see also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 366 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); Moore’s Federal Practice Sd, § 132.03[5][b][l], and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LaRouche v. United States Department of Treasury
Finality ‘may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason for permitting it to be litigated again.’ ” In re Brown, 951 F.2d 564 (3d Cir.1991) (quoting Dyndul v. Dyndul, 620 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir.1980); see also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 366 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 132.03[5][b][i], and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Masotto, 73 F.3d 1233, 1238-39 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 54 , 136 L.Ed.2d 18 (1996); Napoli v. United States, 45 F.3d 680, 683-84 (2d Cir.) (convictions of defendants, who were “high up on the ‘ladder of operation,’ ” were unaffected by Reves error), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1084 , 115 S.Ct. 1796 , 131 L.Ed.2d 724 (1995); see also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 369 (2d Cir.1992) (error in RICO pattern instruction subject to harmless-error analysis), cert, denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); United States v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Masotto, 73 F.3d 1233, 1238-39 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 54 , 136 L.Ed.2d 18 (1996); Napoli v. United States, 45 F.3d 680, 683-84 (2d Cir.) (convictions of defendants, who were "high up on the 'ladder of operation,' " were unaffected by Reves error), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1084 , 115 S.Ct. 1796 , 131 L.Ed.2d 724 (1995); see also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 369 (2d Cir.1992) (error in RICO pattern instruction subject to harmless-error analysis), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); United States v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rooney v. Tyson
Id.; see also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 363 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); In re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation, 762 F.Supp. 519, 526 (E.D.N.Y.1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pobel v. Hans Christian Yachts, Inc.
See also Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 369 (2d Cir.1992) (two years enough), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr.
And, “such agreements may authorize restitution in an amount greater than the loss attributable to the offense of conviction.” Broughton-Jones, 71 F.3d at 1147 ; see also United States v. Soderling, 970 F.2d 529, 534 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2446 , 124 L.Ed.2d 663 (1993); United States v. Rice, 954 F.2d 40, 44 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyer v. Board of County Comr's of Johnson County
See e.g., Jantz v. Muci, 976 F.2d 623, 630-631 (10th Cir.1992) (in Kansas, the final hiring authority rests in the school boards, and that the school boards have no authority to delegate hiring authority to subordinates), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , 124 L.Ed.2d 662 (1993); Ware v. Unified School Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burke v. Dowling
See, e.g., Crazy Eddie, 812 F.Supp. at 351 (holding that “any violation of section 10(b) sufficiently willful to trigger ... criminal penalties ... constitutes ‘fraud in the sale of securities.’ ”) It is therefore unnecessary to consider the contention of the Dowl-ing defendants that a violation of § 17(a) is not a predicate act under RICO. 5 Furthermore, the court notes that for a violation of either § 10(b) or § 12(2) to serve as a RICO predicate act, it must be “willful.” See Metromedia v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 362 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 952 , 113 S.Ct. 2445 , …
Botel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-7520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.