Moore v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local 569, 510 U.S. 1117 (1994). · Go Syfert
Moore v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local 569, 510 U.S. 1117 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
50 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry Ives (ca7, 1997-08-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jennifer Venters v. City of Delphi and Larry Ives
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pilditch v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 3 F.3d 1113 , 1118 n. 2 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1116 , 114 S.Ct. 1065 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 625, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,851 J. Doe and H. Doe, by Their Parents and Next Friends, David and Mary Doe v. City of Belleville, Illinois
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
Although that scenario may not fit comfortably within our preconceived notions of racial harassment, the context of the harassment may nonetheless support the inference that the plaintiff was discriminated against "because of" his race. 14 Price Waterhouse has been statutorily overruled to the extent that a plaintiff can now prevail under Title VII so long as the illicit criterion (here, sex) was a "motivating factor" in the complained of adverse treatment. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m); see Pilditch v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 3 F.3d 1113 , 1118 n. 2 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S.…
discussed Cited "see" Doe ex rel. Doe v. City of Belleville
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
Price Waterhouse has been statutorily overruled to the extent that a plaintiff can now prevail under Title VII so long as the illicit criterion (here, sex) was a “motivating factor” in the complained of adverse treatment. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(m); see Pilditch v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 3 F.3d 1113 , 1118 n. 2 (7th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1116 , 114 S.Ct. 1065 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994). .
cited Cited "see" Socha v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers
D.R.I. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moore v. Local Union 569 of the IBEW, 989 F.2d 1534 , 1541 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1066 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Jean v. Walgreen Co.
N.D. Ill. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See id Therefore, the prima facie case is relatively simple to establish, “designed to see that plaintiff can get beyond summary judgment even though direct evidence is absent.” Pilditch v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 3 F.3d 1113, 1117 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 *1011 S.Ct. 1065, 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shea v. Icelandair
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Evans v. United Arab Shipping Co., 4 F.3d 207 , 213 (3d Cir.1993) (because of medical uncertainty and equivocal expert testimony at trial, district court unable to separate aggravation caused by defendant from normal course of neurological disease), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1065 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994); Richardson v. Britton, 192 F.2d 423, 424 (D.C.Cir.1951) (although contrary medical evidence was presented, there was sufficient evidence to conclude that plaintiffs Parkinson’s disease not caused by blow on the head during automobile collision), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 9…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cruz v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
The section also provides "[t]hat any individual employee or a group of employees shall have the right at anytime to present grievances to their employer.” Id.; see also Moore v. Local Union 569, 989 F.2d 1534 , 1544 (9th Cir.1993) ("[T]he duty of fair representation is based on the ... [NLRA,] which creates a union's exclusive authority to represent all employees in a bargaining unit.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1066 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Socorro Cruz v. Local Union Number 3 Of The International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
The section also provides "[t]hat any individual employee or a group of employees shall have the right at anytime to present grievances to their employer." Id.; see also Moore v. Local Union 569, 989 F.2d 1534 , 1544 (9th Cir.1993) ("[T]he duty of fair representation is based on the ... [NLRA,] which creates a union's exclusive authority to represent all employees in a bargaining unit."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1066 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Albert C. Reeves Dolores Reeves, His Wife v. Mobile Dredging & Pumping Company, Inc., Albert C. Reeves and Dolores Reeves (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Evans v. United Arab Shipping Co., 4 F.3d 207, 214-15 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1065 , 127 L.Ed.2d 385 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moore
v.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569
93-1026.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
510 U.S. 1117
Published

510 U.S. 1117

Moore
v.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569 et al.

No. 93-1026.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 22, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 989 F. 2d 1534.