green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morrow
See United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1153-54 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1132 , 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995) (approving the admission of RFLP evidence under the Daubert test).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin Robert Czeck
See United States v. DeMasi, 40 F.3d 1306, 1312 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995); Ford v. United States, 352 F.2d 927, 928-29, 933 (D.C.Cir.1965) (en banc); cf. United States v. Wixom, 460 F.2d 206, 208-09 (8th Cir.1972) (concluding war-rantless arrest was proper; not clear from facts whether suspects were in car or preparing to get in car at time of arrest).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lowe
See United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1157 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hardy
See United States v. DeMasi, 40 F.3d 1306, 1322 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finalco, Inc. v. Roosevelt
See United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1150 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995) (recognizing the “fact-finding and credibility-weighing functions” of the district court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,998, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4447, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7202 in Re Theodore Steven Roosevelt, Debtor. Finalco, Inc. v. Theodore Steven Roosevelt
See United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1150 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995) (recognizing the "fact-finding and credibility-weighing functions" of the district court).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pratt
See, United States v. Tuesta-Toro, 29 F.3d 771, 775 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pratt
See, United States v. ___ _____________ Tuesta-Toro, 29 F.3d 771, 775 (1st Cir. 1994), cert. denied, ___________ ____________ ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Powell
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. (citing Rule 403).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bad Hand
See e.g., United States v. Newman, 889 F.2d 88 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 959 , 110 S.Ct. 2566 , 109 L.Ed.2d 748 (1990); see also, United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1151, n. 5 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lindia
See Whiting, 28 F.3d at 1305 (refusing to disturb sentencing court’s rejection of “puffing” claim); see also United States v. DeMasi, 40 F.3d 1306 , 1322 n. 18 (1st Cir.1994) (noting that sentencing court’s choice *1162 between supportable plausible inferences cannot amount to clear error), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armstead v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Chischilly, 30 F.3d 1144, 1152-53 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 946 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995); United States v. Bonds, 12 F.3d 540, 561 (6th Cir.1993); People v. Wesley, 83 N.Y.2d 417 , 611 N.Y.S.2d 97, 104 , 633 N.E.2d 451, 458 (1994); Fishback v. People, 851 P.2d 884, 893 (Colo.1993); State v. Cauthron, 120 Wash.2d 879 , 846 P.2d 502, 507 (1993); People v. Mohit, 153 Misc.2d 22 , 579 N.Y.S.2d 990, 992 (Westchester County Ct.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. London
See, e.g., United States v. Tuesta-Toro, 29 F.3d 771, 776 (1st Cir.1994) (setting forth standard of review for sufficiency challenges), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Spinney
See Grubczak, 793 F.2d at 464 (relying on evidence of a defendant’s substantial involvement as a planner of and a “principal player[] in the robbery” to help ground “the inference that he had to have been aware of the likely use of a gun”); see also United States v. DeMasi, 40 F.3d 1306, 1316 (1st Cir.1994) (inferring knowledge that weapons would be employed from accomplice’s awareness of the conspirators’ overall plan), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. London
See, e.g., United States v. Tuesta-Toro, 29 F.3d 771, 776 (1st Cir.1994) (setting forth standard of review for sufficiency challenges), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 947 , 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995). 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wagoner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-7218.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 1995.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.