Duplitronics, Inc. v. Concept Design Elec. & Mfg., Inc., 516 U.S. 812 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Duplitronics, Inc. v. Concept Design Elec. & Mfg., Inc., 516 U.S. 812 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “We consider whether the court’s actions and statements were coercive in the totality of the circumstances.”
137 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 32 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Studebaker v. Uribe (cacd, 2009-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Studebaker v. Uribe
C.D. Cal. · 2009 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we consider whether the court's actions and statements were coercive in the totality of the circumstances.
discussed Cited "see" MULLIGAN FOUNDATION v. Brooks (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See New Jersey Coalition Against War in the Middle East v. J.M.B., 138 N.J. 326, 349 , 650 A. 2d 757 (1994), certif. denied, 516 U.S. 812 , 116 S.Ct. 62 , 133 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Henrico Bautista De La Cruz
9th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jiminez v. Myers, 40 F.3d 976, 979-80 (per curiam), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 63 (1995). 1 13 In the case before us, Judge Brewster did not give an explicit Allen instruction to the jury since he did not ask them to reconsider their positions in the jury deliberations, nor did he encourage them to come to a verdict.
discussed Cited "see" 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8151, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,537, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,765 United States of America v. Rolando Lopez, United States of America v. Josefa Fuentes (2×)
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Maloney, 71 F.3d 645, 658 (7th Cir.1995) (concluding that an instructional error was harmless under Carella test because "[a]lthough in theory a jury under this instruction could convict an individual for obstruction of justice without any evidence of a pending judicial proceeding, the factual circumstances of this case suggest that the actual verdict was not so influenced.") (citing United States v. Parmelee, 42 F.3d 387, 393 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 63 , 133 L.Ed.2d 25 (1995)). 25 Accordingly, we hold that the error in the jury instructions …
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lopez (2×)
9th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Maloney, 71 F.3d 645, 658 (7th Cir.1995) (concluding that an instructional error was harmless under Carella test because “[a]l-though in theory a jury under this instruction could convict an individual for obstruction of justice without any evidence of a pending judicial proceeding, the factual circumstances of this case suggest that the actual verdict was not so influenced.”) (citing United States v. Parmelee, 42 F.3d 387, 393 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 63 , 133 L.Ed.2d 25 (1995)).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Michael Peck v. United States (4×)
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Parmelee, 42 F.3d 387 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 63 , 133 L.Ed.2d 25 (1995); People v. Avila, 35 Cal.App.4th 642 , 43 Cal.Rptr.2d 853 (1995). 60 B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duplitronics, Inc.
v.
Concept Design Electronics & Manufacturing, Inc.
No. 94-1932.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
516 U.S. 812
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.