green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. MD National Capital
See O'Conner v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp., 56 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir. 1995), rev'd on other grounds, 516 U.S. 973 (1996) (holding that a review of an employee's 1989 performance was irrelevant to a determination of whether his performance was satisfactory at the time of his termination in August of 1990). 7 B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marthajane Freeman v. The Principal Financial Group and the Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company
(2×)
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued to Bailin, 51 F.3d 203, 206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 973 , 116 S.Ct. 472 , 133 L.Ed.2d 402 (1995). 5 Freeman's state law claims, although stated in the form of different common law theories, all arise from the management and administration of an insurance claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Salvador Zavala-Zaragoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued to Bailin, 51 F.3d 203, 206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 472 , 133 L.Ed.2d 402 (1995); Wong v. Ilchert, 998 F.2d 661, 662-63 (9th Cir.1993); Clow v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 948 F.2d 614 , 616 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arturo Oscar Lewin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See In re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued to Bailin, 51 F.3d 203, 206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 472 , 133 L.Ed.2d 402 (1995); Wong v. Ilchert, 998 F.2d 661, 662-63 (9th Cir.1993); Clow v. United States Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev., 948 F.2d 614 , 616 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brittni Colleps v. State
App. [Panel Op.] 1978)); see also Morano, 572 S.W.2d at 551 (“It is no more reasonable to argue that the State must enter into a plea bargain with every defendant than to argue that every defendant must plead guilty and enter into a plea bargain.”). 5 Although Colleps contends that the “willingness to immunize their witnesses only after the extent of their criminal acts was revealed is indicative of the degree of vindictiveness and disparate treatment meted out to [her],” we have already addressed her selective- or vindictive-prosecution argument in our resolution of her first issue. 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sawyer
See, e.g., United States v. Bustamante, 45 F.3d 933, 940 (5th Cir.) (“it is sufficient for the government to show that the defendant was given the gratuity simply because he held public office”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 473 , 133 L.Ed.2d 402 (1995); United States v. Niederberger, 580 F.2d 63, 68-69 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 980 , 99 S.Ct. 567 , 58 L.Ed.2d 651 (1978); United States v. Standefer, 610 F.2d 1076, 1080 (3d Cir.1979) (en banc), aff'd on other grounds, 447 U.S. 10 , 100 S.Ct. 1999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 689 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ord & Norman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-25.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1995.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.