green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Amy Cohen v. Brown University
(2×)
See Cohen II, 991 F.2d at 902 (citing Lipsett v. University of P.R., 864 F.2d 881, 897 (1st Cir.1988)); but see Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995) (Title VII sexual harassment standards applied to Title IX sexual harassment case in non-employment context), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
“Plaintiffs, who want to obtain a credential that will help them charge higher prices, have pleaded themselves out of court on the[ir] antitrust claim.” Id. at 252.
cited
Cited "see"
Calderon v. Melhiser
See Sanjuan v. American Bd. Of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
McCormick v. Kissel
See Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Flexcel, Inc. v. Cos 404, Inc.
See Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Boyd v. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc.
See Sanjuan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., 40 F.3d 247, 251 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Stockberger v. United States
See id. (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks Ex Rel. Hicks v. HALIFAX COUNTY BD. EDUC.
See Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, 68 F.3d 525, 539 (1st Cir.1995) ("the plaintiffs’ allegations of interference with family relations and parental prerogatives do not state a privacy or substantive due process claim [and][t]heir free exercise challenge is thus not conjoined with an independently protected constitutional protection”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelley v. Trafalgar House Public Ltd. Co.
See Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 530 (1st Cir. 1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); Clarke v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Cal., Inc., 57 F.3d 21 , 22 n. 1 (1st Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Debra Black v. Zaring Homes, Inc.
See cf. Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 541 (1st Cir.1995) (finding that plaintiffs’ allegations were not so severe as to create an objectively hostile educational environment under Title IX, in part because the sexual comments were not directed at the plaintiffs), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorr-Oliver, Incorporated v. Fluid-Quip, Incorporated and Andrew Franko
See generally Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 65 F.3d 654, 657-58 (7th Cir.1995) (discussing implications of patent law on product configuration trade dress cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); Kohler *380 Co. v. Moen, Inc., 12 F.3d 632, 642-44 (7th Cir.1993) (granting trademark protection to product configurations does not create an unavoidable conflict with patent law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hernandez v. Wangen
See Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540-41 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996) (one-time exposure to offensive speech for AIDS awareness which was not directed at the plaintiffs, was couched in humorous as opposed to abusive terms, and in which the plaintiffs did not have to participate was not sufficiently severe or pervasive); Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hosp., 901 F.2d 186, 192-93 (1st Cir.1990) (two isolated instances of homosexual advances by the plaintiff’s coworker were not sufficiently severe or pervasive …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Turner, United States of America v. Guinn Kelly
See, e.g., United States v. Gardner, 65 F.3d 82, 85-86 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 748 , 1044, 133 L.Ed.2d 696 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996) (mail fraud), and United States v. Lanier, 604 F.2d 1157, 1159 (8th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (false statements on bank deposit forms), dealing specifically with 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (a); see also United States v. Banks, 10 F.3d at 1050 (drug charges), and United States v. Solomon, 726 F.2d 677, 678-79 (11th Cir.1984) (false statements on firearms sale forms).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Oyster River Cooperative School District
See also Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995), (applying Title VII sexual harassment standards to Title IX sexual harassment case in nonemployment context), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guckenberger v. Boston University
Bank, FSB v. Vinson, *314 477 U.S. 57, 64 , 106 S.Ct. 2399, 2404 , 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986), applies to claims of sexual harassment under Title IX); Seamons v. Snow, 84 F.3d 1226, 1232 (10th Cir.1996) (finding a “sexually charged hostile environment cognizable as sexual harassment” under Title IX); see also Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 539 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996); Davis v. Monroe County Board of Educ., 74 F.3d 1186 (11th Cir.1996), vacated pending reh’g en banc, 91 F.3d 1418 (11th Cir.1996); Bruneau v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Edward Hunter v. United States of America, Henry C. Bailey v. John E. Nagle, Warden, Jeff Sessions, Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Compare, e.g., Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 538 (1st Cir.1995) (requiring clear statutory language demanding retroactivity), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996) and Reyes-Hernandez v. INS, 89 F.3d 490, 492 (7th Cir.1996) (presumption against retroac-tivity “unless the statute provides explicitly for retroactive application”; requires “clear statement”) and Chenault v. U.S. Postal Serv., 37 F.3d 535, 537 (9th Cir.1994) (presumption against retroactivity unless statute’s language dictates retroactivity) with Green v. Nottingham, 90…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aversa v. United States
See also Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 6 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 879 , 112 S.Ct. 226 , 116 L.Ed.2d 183 (1991). 14 We have said that substantive due process is violated if either (1) the government actor deprived the plaintiff of an identified interest in life, liberty or property protected by the Fifth Amendment, or (2) the government actor’s conduct “shocks the conscience.” See Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Prods., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 531 (1st Cir.1995) (citations omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Min-Ju Chang
v.
Pena, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Pena, Secretary of Transportation
No. 95-1215.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1996.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.