green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Senior Executive Benefit Plan Participants v. New Valley Corp.
S.Ct. 1316, 134 L.Ed.2d 469 , 470 (1996), that welfare plan participants retained a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty, despite the same general right to terminate or amend held fatal to the participants’ contractual claim in the related Unisys case discussed here, 58 F.3d 896 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alameda Newspapers, Inc. v. City of Oakland, Northern California Newspaper Guild, Local 52, Newspaper Guild, Intervenor-Appellant
See Yniguez v. State of Arizona, 939 F.2d 727 (9th Cir.1991), cert. granted, -U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1316 , 134 L.Ed.2d 469 (1996); Legal Aid Society of Alameda County v. Brennan, 608 F.2d 1319, 1328 (9th Cir.1979); Pellegrino v. Nesbit, 203 F.2d 463 (9th Cir.1953); see also United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald, 432 U.S. 385 , 394-95 & n. 16, 97 S.Ct. 2464 , 2469-70 & n. 16, 53 L.Ed.2d 423 (1977). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture
(2×)
See Bennett v. Plenert, 63 F.3d 915, 921-22 (9th Cir.1995), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1316 , 134 L.Ed.2d 469 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph F. Adler Jacquelyn L. Adler v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Id. at 589-90 ; see also O’Gilvie v. United States, 66 F.3d 1550 , 1556 (10th Cir.1995), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1316 , 134 L.Ed.2d 469 (1996); Wesson v. United States, 48 F.3d 894, 898 (5th Cir.1995); Hawkins v. United States, 30 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2576 , 132 L.Ed.2d 827 (1995); Reese v. United States, 24 F.3d 228, 230 (Fed.Cir. 1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Palmer Communications, Inc.
v.
Total TV
v.
Total TV
No. 95-1176.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1996.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.