green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988). 29 In addition, the lapse of time between reaching the 2% threshold in the previous election and having to obtain petition signers for the next election does not result in an unacceptably close measurement of the same indicia of support as was the case with the two-tier system in Maryland. 9 A minor political party could have polled well in th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988). 30 In addition, the lapse of time between reaching the 2% threshold in the previous election and having to obtain petition signers for the next election does not result in an unacceptably close measurement of the same indicia of support as was the case with the two-tier system in Maryland. 10 A minor political party could have polled well in t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. Corbett
See, e.g., McLaughlin v. North Carolina Bd. of Elections, 65 F.3d 1215 , 1221 (4th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 517 U.S. 1104 , 116 S.Ct. 1320 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Rainbow Coalition v. Oklahoma State Election Bd., 844 F.2d 740 , 741-42 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jin Ku Kim, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Nash Finch Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant
(2×)
See, e.g., Evans v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 65 F.3d 98, 101 (8th Cir.1995) (§ 1981 retaliation claim), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996); Kobrin v. University of Minnesota, 34 F.3d 698, 704 (8th Cir.1994) (Title VII retaliation claim) (Kobrin).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brine v. University Of Iowa
See, e.g., Evans v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 65 F.3d 98, 100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pauline Brine v. University of IA
See, e.g., Evans v. Kansas City, Missouri, School District, 65 F.3d 98, 100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hicks v. Brown
See also Evans v. Kansas City, Mo. School Dist., 65 F.3d 98, 100 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 116 S.Ct. 1319 , 134 L.Ed.2d 472 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLaughlin
v.
North Carolina Board of Elections
v.
North Carolina Board of Elections
No. 95-1196.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1996.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.