green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Veile v. Martinson
See Getter v. WalMart Stores, Inc., 66 F.3d 1119, 1125 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1146 , 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Staley v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
See Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 66 F.3d 1119, 1122-23 (10th Cir.1995) (where district court erroneously denied for-cause challenge but plaintiff used peremptory challenge to remove challenged juror, and made no allegation that jury as seated was biased, error was harmless), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunter v. Supreme Court of New Jersey
See McDaniels v. Flick, 59 F.3d 446, 458-461 (1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996). *1182 In McDaniels , the Third Circuit rejected a due process challenge by a tenured professor who alleged that the pretermination procedure was a sham and the university was predisposed to dismiss him.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Persico v. City of Jersey
“If there is a process on the books that appears to provide due process, the plaintiff cannot skip that process and'use the federal courts as a means to get back what he wants.” Id.; see also McDaniels v. Flick, 59 F.3d 446, 460 (3d Cir.1995), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1146 , 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sams v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 66 F.3d 1119 (10th Cir.1995) (when trial court erroneously denied defendant's motion to strike a juror for cause, and defendant then exercised a peremptory challenge to remove that juror, error was harmless absent a showing of actual bias on the part of the replacement juror), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1146 , 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996). [12] In Gibson the trial court refused a request during voir dire for additional questioning of one of the venire members whose daughter worked for the police department.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cheryle Ann Scheerer John Scheerer v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.
Fed.R.Evid. 702; see, e.g., Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 66 F.3d 1119, 1124 (10th Cir.1995) (upholding exclusion of proffered expert testimony on similar topic), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Laser Industries, Ltd. v. Reliant Technologies, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., General Signal Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 66 F.3d 1500, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1017 , 134 L.Ed.2d 97 (1996). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murray & Murray Co., L. P. A. Profit-Sharing Plan and Trust
v.
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Performance Industries, Inc., fka Mr. Gasket Co., Inc., Real Party in Interest)
v.
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Performance Industries, Inc., fka Mr. Gasket Co., Inc., Real Party in Interest)
No. 95-1026.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1996.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.