green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 ·
…he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
42 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861 in Re: H. Edwin and Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. United States of America v. H. Edwin Schimmels Mary Jo Schimmels
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels)
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the united states. the relator's right to recovery exists solely as a mechanism for deterring fraud and returning funds to the federal treasury
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963 (9th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 518 U.S. 1018 , 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. County of Delaware
See United States ex rel., Green v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963-64 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Dunleavy v. County of Delaware
See United States ex rel., Green v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963-64 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
See Northwest Environmental Advocates v. Portland, 56 F.3d 979, 985-90 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996) (holding citizen suit jurisdiction exists to enforce permit conditions based on state-established standards); Culbertson v. Coats American, Inc., 913 F.Supp. 1572, 1581-82 (N.D.Ga.1995) (holding that “the CWA authorizes citizen, suits for the enforcement of all conditions of NPDES permits” including those imposed by Georgia law); see also Environmental Protection Agency v. California, 426 U.S. 200, 223-24 , 96 S.Ct. 2022, 2033-34 , 48 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. DeCarlo v. Kiewit/AFC Enterprises, Inc.
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 958 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996). 4 In Northrop, the plaintiff claimed that Northrop wrongfully discharged him upon learning that he had uncovered evidence that Northrop was over-billing the United States on a military contract.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. J.E.M. AG Supply, Inc.
See, e.g., Imazio Nursery, Inc. v. Dania Greenhouses, 69 F.3d 1560 (Fed.Cir.1995) (distinguishing between the coverage of patent law for a sexually produced plants and the coverage of the PVPA for sexually reproduced plants), cert. denied, 518 U.S. 1018 , 116 S.Ct. 2549 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996); Plant Patent Amendments Act of 1998, 112 Stat. 2780 , Pub.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Northrop Grumman Corp.
v.
United States ex rel. Green
v.
United States ex rel. Green
No. 95-1730.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.