green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Milestone Scientific Securities Litigation
This requirement ensures alignment of the interests of the Class with those of the class representatives “so that the [class representatives] will work to benefit the entire class through the pursuit of their own goals.” In re Prudential, 148 F.3d at 311 ; see Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 83 F.3d 610, 631 (3d Cir.), aff'd, Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996); Baby Neal, 43 F.3d at 57 .
cited
Cited "see"
Associated Fisheries of Maine, Inc. v. Daley
See United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 715 (1st Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. *113 denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 378 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reilly v. Gould, Inc.
See Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 83 F.3d 610, 632 (3d Cir.), cert. granted, sub nom, Amchem Products Inc. v. Windsor, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996) (where the Third Circuit held that since there were both present and future injury plaintiffs in the class, the future injury plaintiffs’ interests and incentives were in conflict with the representatives).
discussed
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Rhode Island
See Martel v. Fridovich, 14 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1993) (citing Halper for the view that a civil sanction is “punishment” only when it serves the aims of retribution or deterrence). 4 As we explained recently, the Halper “punishment” test applies to “fines, forfeitures, and other monetary penalties designed to make the sovereign whole for harm or loss that is quantifiable in monetary terms.” United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 717 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 378 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kamilewicz v. Bank of Boston Corp.
See Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 83 F.3d 610, 630-31 (3d Cir.1996), cert. granted under the name Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996); In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 714 (1st Cir.1996), cert. dismissed, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 378 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996); United States v. Caraballo-Cruz, 52 F.3d 390, 391 (1st Cir.1995); United States v. Rivera-Martinez, 931 F.2d 148, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 862 , 112 S.Ct. 184 , 116 L.Ed.2d 145 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slugocki v. US BY AND THROUGH DEPT. OF LABOR
"The Halper dichotomy does not apply to non-monetary sanctions." Reed, 937 F.2d at 578 (11th Cir.1991); See also U.S. v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 718 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 378 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slugocki v. United States ex rel. Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Division of Federal Employees' Compensation
“The Halper dichotomy does not apply to non-monetary sanctions.” Reed, 937 F.2d at 578 (11th Cir.1991); See also U.S. v. Stoller, 78 F.3d 710, 718 (1st Cir.), cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 378 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Ford Motor Co. Bronco II Product Liability Litigation
See also Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 83 F.3d 610, 632 (3d Cir.), cert, granted sub. nom. —U.S.—, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996)(citing In re American Medical Sys., Inc., 75 F.3d 1069, 1082 (6th Cir.1996)) (even when the named plaintiffs include a fairly representative mix of plaintiffs, an underlying lack of commonality and attendant conflicts necessarily destroy the possibility of typicality). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hanrahan v. Britt
Litig., 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 88 , 133 L.Ed.2d 45 (1995), the Third Circuit made clear that “ ‘a class is a class is a class,’ and a settlement class, if it is to qualify under [Federal] Rule 23 [of Civil Procedure], must meet all of its requirements.” Id. at 800; see also Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 83 F.3d 610, 624-25 (3d Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Skinner Group, Inc.
Litig., 55 F.3d 768, 786-94 (3d Cir. 1995) (holding that under present rule settlement class must meet all Rule 23 requirements and expressing concern about dangers of overrewarding attorneys and under compensating class members), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 88 , 133 L.Ed.2d 45 (1995); see also Georgine v. Amchem Prods., 83 F.3d 610, 624-25 (3d Cir.1996), cert. granted, U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 379 , 136 L.Ed.2d 297 (1996); John C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amchem Products, Inc.
v.
Windsor
v.
Windsor
No. 96-270.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1996.
Consideration, Motions, Take, Took.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. and National Association of Manufacturers for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certio-rari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, December 16, 1996. Briefs of respondents are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, January 15, 1997. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed[*958] pursuant to this Court’s Rule 25.8. Rule 29.2 does not apply.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and this petition and will take no part in the consideration or decision of this case.