Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. Wingate, 520 U.S. 1239 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. Wingate, 520 U.S. 1239 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Abbott v. New York State Division of State Police (nynd, 2020-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Abbott v. New York State Division of State Police
N.D.N.Y. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chick v. Cty. of Suffolk, 546 F. App'x 58, 60 (2d Cir. 2013)(“In dismissing Chick's disability discrimination claim, the district court correctly determined that disability is not a suspect classification under the Equal Protection Clause.”)(citing Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. Wingate, 101 F.3d 818 , 824 n. 4 (2d Cir.1996), cert denied, 520 U.S. 1239 , 117 S. Ct. 1843 , 137 L.
discussed Cited "see" Salsberg v. Trico Marine Services, Inc. (In Re Trico Marine Services, Inc.)
Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
In short, neither perjury nor nondisclosure, by itself, amounts to anything more than fraud involving injury to a single litigant. *60 860 F.2d at 559-60 (emphasis added); accord Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, 24 F.3d 457, 460 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1843 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1997); New Card, Inc. v. Glenns, No. 00 Civ. 4756(RMB), 2004 WL 540417 , at *3 n. 4 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kilcullen v. New York State Department of Transportation
N.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Coolbaugh, 136 F.3d at 430 n. 1 (holding that Cleburne’s reasoning applies to both physical and mental disabilities and collecting cases); Lussier v. Dugger, 904 F.2d 661, 671 (11th Cir.1990) (“Cleburne thus clearly indicates that legislation affecting persons suffering from a physical handicap ... is to be judged, in the face of an equal protection challenge, in terms of the ‘rationally related,’ and not a higher, standard.”); Bartlett v. New York State Bd. of Law Examiners, 970 F.Supp. 1094 , 1131—32 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (Sotomayor, J.) (finding that City of Cleburne made it “cle…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. Wingate, 101 F.3d 818, 824-27 (2d Cir.1996) (applying rational basis standard to claims of handicapped individuals who challenged state’s denial of funding), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1843 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1997); Story v. Green, 978 F.2d 60, 64 (2d Cir.1992) (noting “in passing that most authorities have not considered .disability to be a suspect or quasi-suspect classification”; providing no discussion of the ADA); More v. Farrier, 984 F.2d 269 (8th Cir.) (applying rational basis test without discussion), cert. denied, 510…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults
v.
Wingate, Commissioner, Suffolk County Department of Social Services
No. 96-1415.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1997.
520 U.S. 1239
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.