green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“because recovery is based on eminent domain, the proper measure is 'what the owner has lost, not what the taker has gained”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gargoyles, Inc., and Pro-Tec, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant
because recovery is based on eminent domain, the proper measure is 'what the owner has lost, not what the taker has gained
discussed
Cited "see"
Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. U.S., 86 F.3d 1566, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1996), vacated on other grounds, 520 U.S. 1183 , 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997) (reducing an award by prior years’ taxes “would be speculative due to Hughes’ particular tax situation, including what actions [the plaintiff] might have taken to reduce such taxes in prior years.”) For these reasons, taxes should not be deducted from Krippelz’s award of prejudgment interest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United States
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 86 F.3d 1566, 1573 (Fed.Cir.1996), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 520 U.S. 1183 , 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), remanded to 140 F.3d 1470, 1477 (Fed.Cir.1998) (reviewing the Court of Federal Claims’ eminent domain valuation and determination of a reasonable royalty for clear error and its selection of a method to arrive at a reasonable royalty for abuse of discretion).
cited
Cited "see"
Jill K. Massie, as Mother and Next Friend of Autumn Massie v. United States
See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 86 F.3d 1566, 1573 (Fed.Cir.1996), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 520 U.S. 1183 , 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
See United States v. Hughes Aircraft Co., — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997) (Hughes XIV).
cited
Cited "see"
American Airlines, Inc. v. Cardoza-Rodriguez
See Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 1996 WL 28508 (E.D.La.), aff'd, 102 F.3d 551 (5th Cir.1996), ce rt. granted, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Airlines, Inc. v. Cardoza-Rodriguez
See Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., 1996 WL 28508 (E.D.La.), aff'd, 102 F.3d 551 (5th Cir.1996), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997) 9 American relies on Deren v. Digital Equip.
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
See United States v. Hughes Aircraft Co., - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See United States v. Hughes Aircraft Co., --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.
See, e.g., Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States, 86 F.3d 1566, 1570 (Fed.Cir.1996) (affirming a finding that an award of interest was “necessary to place [the infringed patent holder] in the position that it would have been had the royalties been paid timely and invested in a prudent and reasonable manner”), vac’d on other grounds, 520 U.S. 1183 , 117 S.Ct. 1466 , 137 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997); T.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oubre
v.
Entergy Operations, Inc.
v.
Entergy Operations, Inc.
No. 96-1291.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1997.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 3 presented by the petition.