green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Carol J. Knight Leonard F. Ball Robert M. Bird Rosemary K. Bird Ann Marie Dahl Joseph Dilley Beverly L. Edwards Michael P. Heaphy Gary John Horwath James K. Hunter Michael E. Johnson David McCord Sally L. Oelrich Deanne P. Pokryfki Donna L. Rehberg v. Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Walter Bromenschenkel, Superintendent Helen Sibson Kenai Peninsula Education Association, Gary Jefferson Eugene L. Dyson David Johnson Daniel L. Hastings Stephen A. McFerron v. Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Walter Bromenschenkel, Superintendent Helen Sibson, Director Kenai Peninsula Education Association, Rebecca L. Patterson Judy O. Weimer Andrew J. Rabung Adolph Hinson Emma L. Smith Carole Gene Murray Marjorie Kyle v. Anchorage School District Robert Christal, Acting Superintendent Anchorage School District Leland C. Wilson, Executive Director/instructional Support Programs and Certified Labor Relations Anchorage Education Association Nea-Alaska, Rebecca L. Patterson Judy O. Weimer Andrew J. Rabung Adolph Hinson Emma L. Smith Carole Gene Murray Marjorie Kyle v. Anchorage School District Robert Christal, Acting Superintendent Anchorage School District Leland C. Wilson, Executive Director/instructional Support Programs and Certified Labor Relations, and Anchorage Education Association Nea-Alaska
See Miller v. Air Line Pilots Association, 108 F.3d 1415, 1421 (D.C.Cir.) (Miller ), petition for cert. granted in part by, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 554 , 139 L.Ed.2d 396 (1997); Bromley v. Michigan Education Ass'n-NEA, 82 F.3d 686, 694 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 682 , 136 L.Ed.2d 607 (1997); Hohe, 956 F.2d at 409 . 52 Those courts that have imposed an exhaustion requirement have done so for three reasons.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Happy Time Day Care Center
See, e.g., Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934, 942-943 (1st Cir.1997), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 554 , 139 L.Ed.2d 396 (1997); Doe v. Kohn, Nast & Graf, 862 F.Supp. 1310 , 1320-1321 n. 7 (E.D.Pa.1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
Compare Runnebaum v. NationsBank of Maryland, 123 F.3d 156 (4th Cir.1997) with Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934 (1st Cir.1997), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct 554 , 139 L.Ed.2d 396 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Compare Runnebaum v. NationsBank, 123 F.3d 156 (4th Cir.1997) (en banc) ("plain meaning of 'impairment’ suggests that asymptomatic HIV infection will never qualify as an impairment”), with Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934, 939 (1st Cir.), cert. granted in part, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 554 , 139 L.Ed.2d 396 (1997) ("HIV-positive status, simpliciter, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, comprises a physical impairment under the ADA”). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ESTATE OF
Mauro argues, however, that because the probability of transmission, the fourth factor of Arline, was so slight, it overwhelmed the first three factors and created a genuine issue of material fact. 26 In determining whether Mauro posed a significant risk or a direct threat in the performance of the essential functions of his job as a surgical technician, Arline instructs that courts should defer to the "reasonable medical judgments of public health officials." 480 U.S. at 288 , 107 S.Ct. at 1131 ; see also Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934, 944-45 (1st Cir.), cert. granted in part, --- U.S. ----…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Mauro ex rel. Mauro v. Borgess Medical Center
In determining whether Mauro posed a significant risk or a direct threat in the performance of the essential functions of his job as a surgical technician, Arline instructs that courts should defer to the “reasonable medical judgments of public health officials.” 480 U.S. at 288 , 107 S.Ct. at 1131 ; see also Abbott v. Bragdon, 107 F.3d 934, 944-45 (1st Cir.), cert. granted in part, —— U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 554 , 139 L.Ed.2d 396 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Endowment for the Arts
v.
Finley
v.
Finley
No. 97-371.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of the Solicitor General is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, January 9, 1998. Brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, February 6, 1998. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 6,1998. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.