green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.9 score
“running through our cases, with fair consistency, is a 'functional' approach to immunity questions”
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rodriguez v. Stevenson
running through our cases, with fair consistency, is a 'functional' approach to immunity questions
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson Ex Rel. Estate of Cano v. Holmes
See Ernst v. Child & Youth Servs., 108 F.3d 486, 497 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 850 , 118 S.Ct. 139 , 139 L.Ed.2d 87 (1997)(holding that social workers have absolute immunity under functional analysis for formulation and presentation of recommendations to the Court); Vosburg v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 884 F.2d 133 , 135 (4th Cir.1989) (holding that social workers are entitled to absolute immunity for functions integral to judicial process including initiation and presentation of case); Salyer v. Patrick, 874 F.2d 374, 378 (6th Cir.1989)(holding that social workers are entitled to abso…
cited
Cited "see"
Behm v. Luzerne County Children & Youth Policy Makers
See Ernst v. Child and Youth Services of Chester County, 108 F.3d 486, 492 (3d Cir.1997), cert denied 522 U.S. 850 , 118 S.Ct. 139 , 139 L.Ed.2d 87 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phifer v. City of New York
See Moccio, 95 F.3d at 200 (citation and internal quotations marks omitted); see also Ernst v. Child and Youth Servs. of Chester County, 108 F.3d 486, 492 (3d Cir.) (finding that plaintiffs claim that defendants violated her right to substantive due process by making recommendations to the state court out of malice and personal bias were not barred by Rooker-Feldman as plaintiff did not articulate those concerns in constitutional due process terms in the state court and plaintiffs substantive due process rights were never decided by the state court), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 850 , 118 S.Ct. 139 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phifer v. City Of New York
See Moccio, 95 F.3d at 200 (citation and internal quotations marks omitted); see also Ernst v. Child and Youth Servs. of Chester County, 108 F.3d 486, 492 (3d Cir.) (finding that plaintiff's claim that defendants violated her right to substantive due process by making recommendations to the state court out of malice and personal bias were not barred by Rooker-Feldman as plaintiff did not articulate those concerns in constitutional due process terms in the state court and plaintiff's substantive due process rights were never decided by the state court), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 850 , 118 S.Ct. 13…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brooks
v.
Normandy Middle School
v.
Normandy Middle School
No. 96-9459.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.