green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Demaio
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Joyce, 229 Conn. 10, 20 , 639 A.2d 1007 (1994) (“[w]e employ [federal] precedent for guidance and analogy when the federal authorities are logically persuasive and well-reasoned” [internal quotation marks omitted]), on appeal after remand, 243 Conn. 282 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sun
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. HOWARD F.
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McColl
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Walker
The court further stated that “[o]f course, the trial court retains wide latitude to permit or preclude such a comment, and may, in its discretion, allow a party to adduce additional evidence relative to the missing witness issue.” Id., 740 ; see State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 305-306 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Graham
Our Supreme Court further provided that “[o]f course, the trial court retains wide lati tude to permit or preclude such a comment, and may, in its discretion, allow a party to adduce additional evidence relative to the missing witness issue.” Id., 740 ; see State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 305-306 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wragg
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Copas
Before reviewing the evidence relating to the defendant’s claim of prosecutorial impropriety, we note, first, that “[m]otive is not an element of the crime charged [and, therefore] . . . [p]roof of motive is never necessary to support a conclusion of guilt otherwise sufficiently established, however significant its presence or absence, or its sufficiency, may be as bearing upon the issue of guilt or innocence.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ruffin, 206 Conn. 678, 681 , 539 A.2d 144 (1988); accord State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 299 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), c…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Story
See State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282 , 288 n.6, 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thompson
More specifically, the trial court must balance the totality of the circumstances surrounding the missing evidence, including the following factors: the materiality of the missing evidence, the likelihood of mistaken interpretation of it by witnesses or the jury, the reason for its nonavailability to the defense and the prejudice to the defendant caused by the unavailability of the evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Morales, supra, 726-27 ; see also State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 300-301 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Polanco
More specifically, the trial court must balance the totality of the circumstances surrounding the missing evidence, including the following factors: the materiality of the missing evidence, the likelihood of mistaken interpretation of it by witnesses or the jury, the reason for its nonavailability to the defense and the prejudice to the defendant caused by the unavailability of the evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Valentine, 240 Conn. 395, 417 , 692 A.2d 727 (1997); see also State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 300-301 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morales
Ed. 2d 281 (1988), and because the defendant has not challenged that finding on appeal, we focus our analysis on the state constitution. 5 See State v. Valentine, 240 Conn. 395, 416-17 , 692 A.2d 727 (1997); see also State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 300 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Correia v. Rowland
See, e.g., State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 300-301 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jackson
We agree. “[M]otive is not an element of the crime charged [and, therefore] . . . [p]roof of motive is never necessary to support a conclusion of guilt otherwise sufficiently established, however significant its presence or absence, or its sufficiency, may be as bearing upon the issue of guilt or innocence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Copas, 252 Conn. 318, 337 , 746 A.2d 761 (2000); State v. Ruffin, 206 Conn. 678, 681 , 539 A.2d 144 (1988); see also State v. Joyce, 243 Conn. 282, 299 , 705 A.2d 181 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1077 , 118 S. Ct. 1523 , 140 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yadav
v.
West Windsor Township
v.
West Windsor Township
No. 97-1475.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
Published
C. A. Sd Cir. Certiorari denied.