green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson-McGunn v. McGunn (In Re McGunn)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Lexington Health Care Center of Elmhurst, Inc. v. McDade (In Re McDade)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Rae v. Scarpello (In Re Scarpello)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kathy Lyster v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc.
The FAA establishes that “as a matter of federal law, any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration, whether the problem at hand is the construction of the contract language itself or an allegation of waiver, delay, or a like defense to arbitrability.” Id.; see Barker v. Golf U.S.A, Inc., 154 F.3d 788, 793 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 796 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Law Firm of Morgan v. LeRoy (In Re LeRoy)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Crawley v. United States (In Re Crawley)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Shevick v. Brodsky (In Re Brodsky)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Wolford v. Ward (In Re Ward)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Sign v. Fultz (In Re Fultz)
Accord In re Reines, 142 F.3d 970, 972-73 (7th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 797 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Enterprises, Inc. v. Olympic Ice Cream
Cone Memorial Hosp., 460 U.S. at 25 , 103 S.Ct. 927 ; see also Barker v. Golf U.S.A, Inc., 154 F.3d 788, 793 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 796 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Citibank USA, N.A.
The court emphasizes that it can consider the Plaintiffs external legal challenges to the arbitration clause as well as his contention that he did not assent to the arbitration clause because these arguments "place the making of the arbitration agreement in issue.” Bess, 294 F.3d at 1306 ("Because these contentions place in issue the enforceability of the arbitration agreement itself, they are to be decided by the court rather than by the arbitrator.”); see Rollins v. Foster, 991 F.Supp. 1426, 1431 (M.D.Ala.1998) (stating that section 4 of the FAA "permits a federal court to hear only *134…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billups v. Bankfirst
The court emphasizes that it can consider the Plaintiffs external legal challenges to the arbitration clause as well as her contention that the she did not assent to the arbitration clause because these arguments "place the making of the arbitration agreement in issue.” Bess, 294 F.3d at 1306 ("Because these contentions place in issue the enforceability of the arbitration agreement itself, they are to be decided by the court rather than by the arbitrator.”); see Rollins v. Foster, 991 F.Supp. 1426, 1431 (M.D.Ala.1998) (stating that section 4 of the FAA "permits a federal court to hear only…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gipson v. Cross Country Bank
The court emphasizes that it can consider the Plaintiffs external legal challenges to the arbitration clause as well as her contention that the she did not assent to the arbitration clause because these arguments "place the making of the arbitration agreement in issue.” Bess, 294 F.3d at 1306 ("Because these contentions place in issue the enforceability of the arbitration agreement itself, they are to be decided by the court rather than by the arbitrator.”); see Rollins v. Foster, 991 F.Supp. 1426, 1431 (M.D.Ala.1998) (stating that section 4 of the FAA "permits a federal court to hear only…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalinski v. Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Barker v. Golf U.S.A., Inc., 154 F.3d 788, 793 (8th Cir.1998) (affirming dismissal because of arbitration clause), cert. denied, *947 525 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 796 , 142 L.Ed.2d 659 (1999); Alford v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 975 F.2d 1161, 1164 (5th Cir.1992) (“The weight of authority clearly supports dismissal of the case when all of the issues raised in the district court must be submitted to arbitration.”) (collecting cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Quinn v. EMC Corp.
Co., 833 F.2d 1159, 1162-64 (5th Cir.1987) (holding that an arbitration clause was not unconscionable for lack of mutuality of obligation, despite the existence, inter alia, of a provision which allowed one party to seek judicial injunction in the case of breach); In re Alamo Lumber Co., 23 S.W.3d 577, 579 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2000, pet. filed) (not released for publication) (finding that mutual promises to arbitrate constitute valid consideration under Texas law when the arbitration agreement allows the employer, but not the employee, to seek judicial remedies for injunctive or equitable r…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barker
v.
Golf U. S. A., Inc.
v.
Golf U. S. A., Inc.
No. 98-644.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 11, 1999.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.