green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
“title vii is designed to encourage the creation of anti-harassment policies and effective grievance mechanisms.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jernigan v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
a generalized fear of retaliation cannot justify a failure to report sexual harassment
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nichols v. Azteca Restaurant Enterprises, Inc.
title vii is designed to encourage the creation of anti-harassment policies and effective grievance mechanisms.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc.
Although we have never addressed the issue, other circuit courts have expressly stated that, for purposes of applying the Faragher/Burlington affirmative defense, “[a] generalized fear of retaliation does not excuse a failure to report sexual harassment.” Barrett v. Applied Radiant Energy Corp., 240 F.3d 262, 266 (4th Cir.2001); see Shaw v. AutoZone, Inc., 180 F.3d 806, 813 (7th Cir.1999) (“[W]e conclude that an employee’s subjective fears of confrontation, unpleasantness or retaliation do not alleviate the employee’s duty under Ellerth to alert the employer to the allegedly hostile …
discussed
Cited "see"
House of God v. White
See Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc., 712 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), appeal dismissed, 737 So.2d 1077 (Fla.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1075 , 120 S.Ct. 789 , 145 L.Ed.2d 666 (2000)(finding that although trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over rabbi's breach of contract claim, the court lacked jurisdiction over his complaint for defamation and tortious interference because resolving these disputes would require the court to become excessively entangled with religious beliefs).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madray v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
(2×)
See Shaw v. AutoZone, Inc., 180 F.3d 806, 812 (7th Cir.1999) (concluding that a sexual harassment policy was reasonable when the offending supervisor’s immediate supervisor “visited the store approximately every two to three weeks”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 790 , 145 L.Ed.2d 666 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Madray v. Publix Supermarkets
(2×)
See Shaw v. Autozone, Inc., 180 F.3d 806, 812 (7th Cir. 1999) (concluding that a sexual harassment policy was reasonable when the offending supervisor’s immediate supervisor “visited the store approximately every two to three weeks”), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 790 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Faye Haugerud v. Amery School District
Thus, this is not like the majority of the cases we consider, in which plaintiff contests the efficacy of the employers response; see, e.g., Shaw v. AutoZone, Inc., 180 F.3d 806, 811-12 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1076 , 120 S.Ct. 790 , 145 L.Ed.2d 666 (2000), this is a case where the employer simply did not act.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haugerud, Faye v. Amery School Dist
Thus, this is not like the majority of the cases we consider, in which plaintiff contests the efficacy of the employers response; see, e.g., Shaw v. AutoZone, Inc., 180 F.3d 806, 811-12 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1076 , 120 S. Ct. 790 , 145 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goodman
v.
Temple Shir Ami, Inc.
v.
Temple Shir Ami, Inc.
No. 99-607.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · D. Oregon (1)
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.