green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Ray Norem v. State of Iowa
See O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 528 U.S. 838 , 847–48 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Waring
See State v. McNeill, 349 N.C. 634, 655 , 509 S.E.2d 415, 427 (1998) (“We note that the fact that a defendant is sentenced to death while a codefendant receives a life sentence for the same crime is not determinative of proportionality.” (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. McNeill, 349 N.C. 634, 642-43 , 509 S.E.2d 415, 420 (1998) (stating that defendant did not have the right to be present when prospective jurors were sworn in by a deputy clerk in the jury assembly room and the jurors “were subject to assignment in any one of six superior courts in session as well as any number of district courts”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
McNeill v. Branker
See McNeill v. North Carolina, 528 U.S. 838 , 120 S.Ct. 102 , 145 L.Ed.2d 87 (1999) 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Zamora-Ramos
See State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573, 584-85 , 509 S.E.2d 752, 758-59 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lanier
See State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573 , 509 S.E.2d 752 (1998) (evidence of husband’s increasingly violent assaults on his wife relevant to show lack of accident in trial for her murder), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
See State v. McNeill, 349 N.C. 634, 648 , 509 S.E.2d 415, 423 (1998) (holding that any potential prejudice was cured by the trial court’s instruction to the jury not to consider the objectionable remark, and that the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a mistrial), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Castor
See State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573 , 509 S.E.2d 752 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bustos-Useche
See United States v. Cardales, 168 F.3d 548, 554 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 120 S.Ct. 101 , 145 L.Ed.2d 86 (1999); United States v. Klimavicius-Viloria, 144 F.3d 1249, 1256 (9th Cir.1998); United States v. Medina, 90 F.3d 459, 461 (11th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas v. American Blastfax, Inc.
See United States v. Weathers, 169 F.3d 336, 341 (6th Cir.1999) (“It is well established that telephones, even when used intrastate, constitute instrumentalities of interstate commerce.”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 120 S.Ct. 101 , 145 L.Ed.2d 85 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Aldridge
(2×)
See State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573, 587 , 509 S.E.2d 752, 759 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
See, e.g., State v. McNeill, 349 N.C. 634, 653 , 509 S.E.2d 415, 426 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coleman
App. 706, 713 , 534 S.E.2d 629, 634 , disc. denied, 353 N.C. 269 , 546 S.E.2d 114 (2000) (quoting State v. Johnson, 295 N.C. 227, 234-35 , 244 S.E.2d 391, 396 (1978)); see also, State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573, 599-600 , 509 S.E.2d 752, 767 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Drury
Compare United States v. Weathers, 169 F.3d 336 (6th Cir.) (finding that § 1958 requires that the facility actually be used in interstate commerce), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 120 S.Ct. 101 , 145 L.Ed.2d 85 (1999); United States v. Paredes, 950 F.Supp. 584, 590 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (same), aff'd, 162 F.3d 1149 (2nd Cir.1998) (table), with United States v. Marek, 238 F.3d 310 (5th Cir.) (finding that using a facility capable of interstate commerce is sufficient), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 813 , 122 S.Ct. 37 , 151 L.Ed.2d 11 (2001). 6 At least two components of § 1958 contribute to this confusion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Drury
Compare United States v. Weathers, 169 F.3d 336 (6th Cir.) (finding that § 1958 requires that the facility actually be used in interstate commerce), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 120 S.Ct. 101 , 145 L.Ed.2d 85 (1999); United States v. Paredes, 950 F.Supp. 584, 590 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (same), aff'd, 162 F.3d 1149 (2nd Cir.1998) (table), with United States v. Marek, 238 F.3d 310 (5th Cir.) (finding that using a facility capable of interstate commerce is sufficient), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 813 , 122 S.Ct. 37 , 151 L.Ed.2d 11 (2001). 6 At least two components of § 1958 contribute to this confusion. 39…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fowler
See, e.g., State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573 , 509 S.E.2d 752 (1998) (where defendant testified that weapon discharged accidentally, victim’s sister properly allowed to demonstrate physical impossibility of wounds being inflicted as depicted in autopsy photograph unless weapon was fired intentionally), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lloyd
See, e.g., State v. Murillo, 349 N.C. 573, 594 , 509 S.E.2d 752, 764 (1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 838 , 145 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robbins
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 98-9517.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.