Clements v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 529 U.S. 1117 (2000). · Go Syfert
Clements v. Florida Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 529 U.S. 1117 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Williams v. County of Pinal (ca9, 2001-04-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Williams v. County of Pinal
9th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
The district court did not err by dismissing Williams’ 1999 action based on the Arizona statute of limitations because Williams’ claim accrued at the latest in 1991 when he was injured, see id. at 914, and Williams had a reasonable amount of time to file suit after the effective date of the amended Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-502 (1995), see id. at 915-16 (almost two years after the effective date of a statutory amendment is a reasonable amount of time to file suit).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clements
v.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
No. 99-8765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2000.
529 U.S. 1117
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.