green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Williams v. County of Pinal
The district court did not err by dismissing Williams’ 1999 action based on the Arizona statute of limitations because Williams’ claim accrued at the latest in 1991 when he was injured, see id. at 914, and Williams had a reasonable amount of time to file suit after the effective date of the amended Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-502 (1995), see id. at 915-16 (almost two years after the effective date of a statutory amendment is a reasonable amount of time to file suit).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clements
v.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
v.
Florida Parole and Probation Commission
No. 99-8765.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2000.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.