green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
17.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2013–2015 ·
…the bankruptcy court appropriately took judicial notice of its own docket.
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Butler v. Candlewood Road Partners, LLC (In re Raymond)
the bankruptcy court appropriately took judicial notice of its own docket.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Harris v. Boston Private Bank & Trust Co. (In re Harris)
the bankruptcy court appropriately took judicial notice of its own docket.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Snider v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.)
congress responded by passing the predecessor of the present section 959(a) to suspend the approval requirement for suits arising in the course of carrying out business connected with trust property
discussed
Cited "see"
Lassman v. Mahfouz (In re Mahfouz)
See LeBlanc v. Salem (In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.), 196 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1230 , 120 S.Ct. 2661 , 147 L.Ed.2d 275 (2000)(‘‘The bankruptcy court appropriately took judicial notice of its docket[.]”). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lassman v. Patts (In Re Patts)
See LeBlanc v. Salem (In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.), 196 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1230 , 120 S.Ct. 2661 , 147 L.Ed.2d 275 (2000); In re Hyde, 334 B.R. 506 , 508 n. 2 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2005). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodney v. Arias (In Re Arias)
See LeBlanc v. Salem (In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.), 196 F.3d 1, 8 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1230 , 120 S.Ct. 2661 , 147 L.Ed.2d 275 (2000); In re Hyde, 334 B.R. 506 , 508 n. 2 (Bankr.D.Mass.2005). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George Dale
See, e.g., LeBlanc v. Salem (In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.) 196 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1999) (“Affirmative pleading of the precise statutory basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction is not required as long as a complaint alleges sufficient facts to establish jurisdiction.”), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1230 , 120 S.Ct. 2661 , 147 L.Ed.2d 275 (2000); Gerritsen v. de la Madrid Hurtado, 819 F.2d 1511, 1515 (9th Cir.1987) (“[I]n determining the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, we are not limited to the jurisdictional statutes identified in the complaint.”); Vukonich v. Ci…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Indian Motocycle Co., Inc.
See also LeBlanc v. Salem (In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.), 196 F.3d 1, 3-5 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1230 , 120 S.Ct. 2661 , 147 L.Ed.2d 275 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Voting Integrity Project, Inc.
v.
Bomer, Secretary of State of Texas
v.
Bomer, Secretary of State of Texas
No. 99-1685.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (2) · N.D. Oklahoma (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.