green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
“state-court petition ... that is filed following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Curiel v. Fleker
state-court petition ... that is filed following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Secretary, DOC
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (finding that even properly filed state-court petitions must be pending in order to toll the limitations period, and that a state court petition that is filed “following the expiration of the limitations period cannot toll that period because there is no period remaining to be tolled”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Casey Bridges v. Curtis Johnson
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.) (holding that a state court petition filed after the expiration of the AEDPA’s one-year limitations period cannot toll that period “because there is no period remaining to be tolled”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Randle
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Owens v. Stine
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Winters v. Edwards
See Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 991 , 121 S.Ct. 481 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. County of Prince William
See Saucier v. Katz, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 480 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000) (granting certiorari on, inter alia, the issue of whether the reasonableness inquiry merges when analyzing qualified immunity in an excessive force claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Russell
See Saucier v. Katz, -U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 480 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000) (granting certiorari on, inter alia, the issue of whether the reasonableness inquiry merges when analyzing qualified immunity in an excessive force claim). .
cited
Cited "see"
Locke v. Saffle
See Walker v. Artuz, 208 F.3d 357, 358 (2d Cir.), cert. granted,-U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 480 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Petrick v. Martin
See Walker v. Artuz, 208 F.3d 357, 359-61 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 480 , 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chute
v.
Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.
v.
Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.
No. 00-6420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 2000.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 4, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.