Doe v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 531 U.S. 1073 (2001). · Go Syfert
Doe v. Dallas Indep. Sch. Dist., 531 U.S. 1073 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“if a party who has been examined at length in deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.”
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Roberts v. National Autotech, Inc. (txnd, 2002-01-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Roberts v. National Autotech, Inc.
N.D. Tex. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if a party who has been examined at length in deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.
discussed Cited "see" Companion Property & Casualty Insurance v. Opheim
N.D. Tex. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Doe v. Dallas Independent School District, 220 F.3d 380, 386 (5th Cir.2000) (“If a party who has béen examined at length on deposition could raise an issue of fact simply by submitting an affidavit contradicting his own prior testimony, this would greatly diminish the utility of summary judgment as a procedure for screening out sham issues of fact.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1073 , 121 S.Ct. 766 , 148 L.Ed.2d 667 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe
v.
Dallas Independent School District
No. 00-645.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1073

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.