Calcano-Martinez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 531 U.S. 1108 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Calcano-Martinez v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 531 U.S. 1108 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Martin v. Rios (ca10, 2007-01-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Martin v. Rios
10th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booker v. Ward, 531 U.S. 1108 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Robert Dale Martin v. Hector A. Rios, Warden
10th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booker v. Ward, 531 U.S. 1108 , 121 S.Ct. 851 , 148 L.Ed.2d 766 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Barton v. Ashcroft (2×)
D. Conn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 232 F.3d 328 , 333-34 (2d Cir.2000), cert. granted, 531 U.S. 1108 , 121 S.Ct. 849 , 148 L.Ed.2d 733 (2001); Henderson v. INS, 157 F.3d 106, 118-22 (2d Cir.1998).
discussed Cited "see" Sousa v. Reno
D. Mass. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Calcano-Martinez v. INS, 232 F.3d 328, 337-38 (2nd Cir.2000), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 849 , 148 L.Ed.2d 733 (2001); Liang v. INS, 206 F.3d 308, 323 (3rd Cir.2000), petition for cert. filed, 69 U.S.L.W. 3346 (Nov. 6, 2000) (No. 00-753); Flores-Miramontes v. INS, 212 F.3d 1133, 1140 (9th Cir.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calcano-Martinez
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 00-1011.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 2001.
531 U.S. 1108
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, February 26, 2001. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 28, 2001. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 16, 2001. This Court’s Rule 29.2 is suspended in this case.