green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hyman
Id. at 323 . "[A]ny error was one of form rather than substance. [The agent] was clearly qualified; that her credentials were established after she began her substantive testimony, rather than at its outset, did not affect [the defendant's] substantial rights." Ibid. ; see also United States v. Mendoza , 244 F. 3d 1037 , 1046 (9th Cir.) (finding harmless the admission of lay opinion, instead of expert opinion, where the court "discern[s] from the record that the witness could have been qualified as an expert"), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 221 , 151 L.Ed. 2d 158 (2001) ; *459 United…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ELEX HYMAN(10-11-2077, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
Id. at 323 . "[A]ny error was one of form rather than substance. [The agent] was clearly qualified; that her credentials were established after she began her substantive testimony, rather than at its outset, did not affect [the defendant's] substantial rights." Ibid.; see also United States v. Mendoza, 244 F.3d 1037, 1046 (9th Cir.) (finding harmless the admission of lay opinion, instead of expert opinion, where the court "discern[s] from the record that the witness could have been qualified as an expert"), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S. Ct. 221 , 151 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gonzales
See also United States v. Lopez, 248 F.3d 427, 432 (5th Cir.) (relying on these three passages from McPhail to conclude that Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 , 119 S.Ct. 1707 , 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999), announced a substantive rule regarding the scope of 21 U.S.C. § 848 (a)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 898 , 122 S.Ct. 222 , 151 L.Ed.2d 158 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mendez-Argueta
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mendoza, 244 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 897 , 122 S.Ct. 221 , 151 L.Ed.2d 158 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCato v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 248 F.3d 427, 430-32 (5th Cir.) (applying Richardson retroactively to case on collateral review pursuant to § 2255 116(3)), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 222 , 151 L.Ed.2d 158 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pena-Perez, aka Arambula-Hernandez
v.
United States Molina-Flores v. United States and Moranchel-Magana v. United States
v.
United States Molina-Flores v. United States and Moranchel-Magana v. United States
No. 01-5014.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F. 3d 703 (first and second judgments) and 704 (third judgment).