green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2009 ·
…the focus is on the school board's pattern of conduct, and not isolated events, because the purpose of the good-faith finding is to ensure that a school board has accepted racial equality and will abstain from intentional discrimination in the future.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
State v. Penalber
But see United States v. Gori, 230 F. 3d 44, 50-54 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 824 , 122 S.Ct. 62 , 151 L.Ed. 2d 29 (2001).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smiley v. Blevins
(2×)
the focus is on the school board's pattern of conduct, and not isolated events, because the purpose of the good-faith finding is to ensure that a school board has accepted racial equality and will abstain from intentional discrimination in the future.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mata
See id. at 415 (noting that this court had previously upheld a § 3B1.4 enhancement where "the defendant brought minor children on a drug run to avoid detection by law enforcement”) (citing United States v. Gutierrez, 251 F.3d 156 , 2001 WL 300644 , at *1 (5th Cir. Feb. 28, 2001) (per curiam) (unpublished table decision), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 823 , 122 S.Ct. 60 , 151 L.Ed.2d 28 (2001)). 24 . 228 Fed.Appx. 462, 463 (5th.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc.
See Contreras v. Suncast Corp., 237 F.3d 756, 764 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 824 , 122 S.Ct. 62 , 151 L.Ed.2d 29 (2001); Helfter v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 115 F.3d 613, 616 (8th Cir.1997) (concluding general statements in affidavit concerning health of plaintiff suing under ADA insufficient to withstand properly supported summary judgment motion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles E. Wood v. Crown Redi-Mix, Inc.
See Contreras v. Suncast Corp., 237 F.3d 756, 764 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 824 , 122 S.Ct. 62 , 151 L.Ed.2d 29 (2001); Helfter v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 115 F.3d 613, 616 (8th Cir.1997) (concluding general statements in affidavit concerning health of plaintiff suing under ADA insufficient to withstand properly supported summary judgment motion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sussle v. Sirina Protection Systems Corp.
(2×)
“Bald or self-serving assertions in affidavits [and depositions], unsubstantiated by documentation or other testimony, are not sufficient to create a material issue of fact as to whether an impairment has substantially limited a major life activity.” Stein v. Ashcroft (7th Cir.2002) 284 F.3d 721, 726 ; see also Contreras v. Suncast Corp. (7th Cir.2001) 237 F.3d 756, 764 , cert. denied (2001) 534 U.S. 824 , 122 S.Ct. 62 , 151 L.Ed.2d 29 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Green
v.
Bellerive Condominiums Limited Partnership
v.
Bellerive Condominiums Limited Partnership
No. 00-1868.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (2)
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.