green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’” Sanin, 252 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilcher
See United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001); and cases cited at page 3-4 of the Government’s motion to dismiss the petition.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosario-Dominguez v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bryan
See United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 84-85 (2d Cir.) (finding no Bruton or Gray error where prosecutors used the phrases “several individuals” and “individuals” in lieu of codefendants’ names), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 151 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rodriguez-Garcia
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 01-6419.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 2001.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.