green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis Tree Service, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.
See In re Gaston & Snow, 243 F.3d 599, 605 (2d Cir.2001) (noting that “prior cases dealing with ... federal statutes that provide a federal forum for claims that hinge upon state law do not provide clear guidance” as to which choice of law rules are to be applied by federal district court), cert. *327 denied — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 618 , 151 L.Ed.2d 540 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel M. Perez v. Region 20 Education Service Center
See Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 242 F.3d 315, 322 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 618 , 151 L.Ed.2d 540 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gulfcoast Workstation Corp. v. Peltz (In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)
FDIC v. Deloitte & Touche, 834 F.Supp. 1129 , 1135 n. 3 (E.D.Ark.1992); see also Bianco v. Erkins (In re Gaston & Snow), 243 F.3d 599, 606-07 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 534 U.S. 1042 , 122 S.Ct. 618 , 151 L.Ed.2d 540 (2001) (noting that bankruptcy courts must apply the forum state’s choice of law principles when the parties’ substantive rights and liabilities under the Code are a function of state law).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zellweger et ux.
v.
City of Alliance
v.
City of Alliance
No. 01-522.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 2001.
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Stark County. Certiorari denied.