green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Pataki
See Robertson v. Bartels, 148 F.Supp.2d 443, 458 (D.N.J.2001) (finding that strict scrutiny did not apply because the districting plan “carefully was drawn utilizing traditional redistrieting principles while seeking to comply with the Voting Rights Act by giving minority candidates the opportunity to be elected to political office”), aff'd mem., 534 U.S. 1110 , 122 S.Ct. 914 , 151 L.Ed.2d 881 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater
See Redner, 29 F.3d at 1495 ; Artistic Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Warner Robins, 223 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir.2000) (adult business ordinance); U.S. v. Frandsen, 212 F.3d 1231 (11th Cir.2000) (park ordinance regarding assembly); see also Cannabis Action Network, Inc. v. City of Gainesville, 231 F.3d 761 (11th Cir.2000) (street closing and sound ordinance declared facially unconstitutional as “prior restraint”), judgment vacated , — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 914 , 151 L.Ed.2d 881 (Jan. 22, 2002) (remanded to consider in light of Thomas v. Chicago Park ). 15 For these requirements to apply, the per…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Litton Systems, Inc.
v.
Honeywell, Inc.
v.
Honeywell, Inc.
No. 00-1617.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 2002.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.1.