green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.3 score
“because madlem does not challenge the findings of the trial court, they must be accepted as correct.”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of N.H. and K.M. (Children) and: A.M. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (mem. dec.)
because madlem does not challenge the findings of the trial court, they must be accepted as correct.
discussed
Cited "see"
Knox County Association for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. Melissa (Cope) Davis
See In re L.S ., 717 N.E.2d 204 , 208 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (statute written in disjunctive requires proof of only one of the prongs ), reh'g denied, trans. denied, cert. denied 534 U.S. 1161 , 122 S.Ct. 1197 , 152 L.Ed.2d 136 (2002). 7 The parties' arguments focus on the first two prongs of the Powdertech test to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination in employment: whether Davis is disabled within the meaning of the ADA and whether she is qualified to complete the essential functions of her position.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re RJ
See In re L.S., 717 N.E.2d 204, 208 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (observing that the trial court must judge parental fitness at the time of the hearing), trans. denied (2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1161 , 122 S.Ct. 1197 , 152 L.Ed.2d 136 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Lake County Office of Family & Children
See In re LS., N.E.2d 204, 208 (Ind.Ct.App.1999) (observing that the trial court must judge parental fitness at the time of the hearing), trans. denied (2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1161 , 122 S.Ct. 1197 , 152 L.Ed.2d 186 (2002), Although the current caseworker testified that he was unaware of any such plan and that Johnson's sister was not available to care for R.J. while he was at work, he also testified his last contact with Johnson had almost three months prior to the hearing.
cited
Cited "see"
Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart
See Aloe Energy Corp. v. Barnhart, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1170 , 152 L.Ed.2d 114 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Snavely
v.
Oxford Global Resources
v.
Oxford Global Resources
No. 01-7470.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Indiana Court of Appeals (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.