Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., Afl-Cio v. Overnite Transp. Co, 535 U.S. 928 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of Am., Afl-Cio v. Overnite Transp. Co, 535 U.S. 928 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rosalyn Caffey v. Unum Life Insurance Co. (ca6, 2002-09-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rosalyn Caffey v. Unum Life Insurance Co.
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
In order to give the term “equitable relief’ meaning, the Court explained, *584 courts must “limit restitution to the return of identifiable funds (or property) belonging to the plaintiff and held by the defendant-that is, ... limit restitution to the form of restitution traditionally available in equity.” Id.; see also Helfrich v. PNC Bank, Ky., Inc., 267 F.3d 477, 481 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 1298 , 152 L.Ed.2d 210 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Afl-Cio
v.
Overnite Transportation Co
01-974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
535 U.S. 928
Published

535 U.S. 928

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.
v.
OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION CO.

No. 01-974.

Supreme Court of the United States.

March 18, 2002.

1

Ct. App. Tex., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.