Walser v. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. for the City of Richfield, 537 U.S. 974 (2002).

Walser v. Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. for the City of Richfield, 537 U.S. 974 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 2.4 score

14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Martinez v. Dretke (txwd, 2006-03-29)

Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. Dretke

W.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high

See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge’s generic juror screening questions and the jurors’ written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002).

discussed Cited "see" Gutierrez v. Dretke

W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high

See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge's generic juror screening questions and the jurors' written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002). 133 .

discussed Cited "see" Cervantes Salazar v. Dretke

W.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high

See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 341 (5th Cir.2002) (holding trial counsel acted in an objectively reasonable manner in relying on the state trial judge’s generic juror screening questions and the jurors’ written questionnaire answers to identify those members of the jury venire who were unqualified for jury service), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dwayne A. Berger

11th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high

See Mayo v. Cockrell, 287 F.3d 336, 339 (5th Cir.2002) (“Several federal courts of appeals have held that there is no constitutional right to counsel for post-appeal motions for new trial.”), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 975 , 123 S.Ct. 443 , 154 L.Ed.2d 332 (2002); Trenkler v. United States, 268 F.3d 16, 20 (1st Cir.2001) (noting post-conviction, post-appeal Rule 33 motions are collateral and that a criminal defendant has no Sixth Amendment right to an attorney in such a proceeding); Johnson v. United States, 246 F.3d 655, 658 (6th Cir.2001) (“[A] delayed Rule 33 motion is a collateral challe…