Flores-Flores v. United States, 539 U.S. 937 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Flores-Flores v. United States, 539 U.S. 937 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Padberg v. Giuliani (ca2, 2008-10-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Padberg v. Giuliani
2d Cir. · 2008 · signal: accord · confidence high
Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S. 827, 835-36 , 110 S.Ct. 1570 , 108 L.Ed.2d 842 (1990) (“[T]he purpose of postjudgment interest is to compensate the successful plaintiff for being deprived of compensation for the loss from the time between the ascertainment of the damage and the payment by the defendant.”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); accord Goodrich Corp. v. Town of Middlebury, 311 F.3d 154, 178 (2d Cir. 2002), cert denied, 539 U.S. 937 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 621 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.
W.D.N.Y. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Goodrich Corp. v. Town of Middlebury, 311 F.3d 154, 170 (2d Cir.2002) (allocation of response costs is “an equitable determination based on the district court’s discretionary selection of the appropriate equitable factors in a given case.”), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 937 , 123 S.Ct. 2577 , 156 L.Ed.2d 621 (2003); Bedford Affiliates v. Sills, 156 F.3d 416, 429 (2d Cir.1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flores-Flores
v.
United States, Hernandez Prado v. United States, Lara-Quintanilla v. United States, Solares-Cuba v. United States, Garcia-Sanchez v. United States, Rosales v. United States, Rodriguez-Perez v. United States, and Mondragon v. United States
02-10688.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2003.
539 U.S. 937
Published

539 U.S. 937

Flores-Flores
v.
United States,
Hernandez Prado
v.
United States,
Lara-Quintanilla
v.
United States,
Solares-Cuba
v.
United States,
Garcia-Sanchez
v.
United States,
Rosales
v.
United States,
Rodriguez-Perez
v.
United States, and
Mondragon
v.
United States.

No. 02-10688.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 16, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 920 (first judgment), 921 (third through eighth judgments), and 922 (second judgment).