green
Positive treatment
13.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
D.B.P. v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999); Davis v. State, 922 So.2d 438, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
DBP v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999); Davis v. State, 922 So.2d 438, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Reaves
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), ce rt. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999); Davis v. State, 922 So.2d 438, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Allen
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999); Davis v. State, 922 So.2d 438, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pritchard v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999); Davis v. State, 922 So.2d 438, 443 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Irizarry
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla. 2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blake v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramos v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Pagan v. State, 830 So.2d 792 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 919 , 123 S.Ct. 2278 , 156 L.Ed.2d 137 (2003); San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 468 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1071 , 119 S.Ct. 1468 , 143 L.Ed.2d 553 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); see also Johnson v. State, 904 So.2d 400 (Fla.2005) (holding that Ring does not apply retroactively).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003) (noting that prior violent conviction aggravator was supported by contemporaneous felonies charged in the indictment and of which the jury found the defendant unanimously guilty).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Fitzpatrick v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Dessaure v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hernandez-Alberto v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 964 (Fla.) (Pariente, J., concurring as to the conviction and concurring in result only as to the sentence) (stating that the prior violent felony aggravator makes it unnecessary to determine whether the nonunanimous recommendation renders the death sentence unconstitutional), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Kimbrough v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940 (Fla.), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Globe v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnston v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (CFla.) (stating that prior violent felony aggravator based on contemporaneous crimes charged by indictment and on which defendant was found guilty by unanimous jury "clearly satisfies the mandates of the United States and Florida Constitutions"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Lugo v. State, 845 So.2d 74 , 119 n. 79 (Fla.2003) (noting rejection of Ring claims in postconviction appeals, unanimous guilty verdict on other felonies, and "existence of prior violent felonies"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 320 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
Matheson v. State
See Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 952 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Doctor v. State, 596 So.2d 442, 445 (Fla.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lebron v. State
Ring need not be found by the jury.” Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.2003) (rejecting the Ring claim where one of the aggravating factors found by the trial court was the defendant’s prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lebron v. State
Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.2003) (rejecting the Ring claim where one of the aggravating factors found by the trial court was the defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Overton v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court here was Overton's previous conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting the Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gore v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this matter was Gore's prior conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.2003) (rejecting the Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was the defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hannon v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was Hannon's prior conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla. 2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.2003) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Johnson v. State, 904 So.2d 400 (Fla.2005) (holding that Ring does n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was prior convictions of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perez v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was a prior conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla. 2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dufour v. State
(2×)
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was Dufour's prior *69 conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal, 837 So.2d at 963 (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was Johnson's prior conviction of a violent felony, [14] "a factor which under Apprendi [15] and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court in this case was Johnson's prior conviction of a violent felony, [14] "a factor which under Apprendi [15] and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla. 2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crain v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 49 (Fla.2003), cert denied, 541 U.S. 993 , 124 S.Ct. 2023 , 158 L.Ed.2d 500 (2004); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (stating that prior violent felony aggravator based on contemporaneous crimes charged by indictment and on which defendant was found guilty by unanimous jury "clearly satisfies the mandates of the United States and Florida Constitutions"), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dillbeck v. State
Furthermore, one of the aggravating circumstances found by the *977 trial court in this case was Dillbeck's prior conviction of a violent felony, "a factor which under Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000),] and Ring need not be found by the jury." Jones v. State, 855 So.2d 611, 619 (Fla.2003); see also, e.g., Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.2003) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sochor v. State
See, e.g., Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where one of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge was defendant's prior conviction for a violent felony), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 962 , 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003); Belcher v. State, 851 So.2d 678, 685 (Fla.) (rejecting Ring claim where two of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial judge were defendant's prior violent felony and that the murder was committed in the course of a felony), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 816 , 157 L.Ed.2d 706 (2003). [28] IV.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zakrzewski v. State
See Duest v. State, 855 So.2d 33, 52 (Fla.2003); see also Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) (stating that prior violent felony aggravator based on contemporaneous crimes charged by indictment and on which defendant was found guilty by unanimous jury "clearly satisfies the mandates of the United States and Florida Constitutions"), cert denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart v. State
See, e.g., Doorbal v. State, 837 So.2d 940, 963 (Fla.) cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2647 , 156 L.Ed.2d 663 (2003). [3] In a footnote, Stewart argues that the State's expert had a conflict of interest because he was a witness for the defense in the original penalty phase.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patrick
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
02-10382.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 2003.
Published
Patrick
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.
No. 02-10382.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 27, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied.