Martinez-Martinez v. United States, 543 U.S. 1013 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Martinez-Martinez v. United States, 543 U.S. 1013 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. David Louis Hunter (ca11, 2006-11-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David Louis Hunter
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249, 1257-58 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1013 , 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004) (citations omitted); United States v. Orduno-Mireles, 405 F.3d 960, 962 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 223 , 163 L.Ed.2d 191 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Burgara-Montana
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 369 F.3d 1076, 1088-90 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1013 , 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Clinton Givens
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249 , 1257 & n. 14 (11th Cir.2004), cert, denied, 543 U.S. 1013 , 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004); United States v. Thomas, 242 F.3d 1028, 1035 (11th Cir.2001), cert, denied, 533 U.S. 960 , 121 S.Ct. 2616 , 150 L.Ed.2d 770 (2001); United States v. Guadamuz-Solis, 232 F.3d 1363 , 1363 (11th Cir.2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Heick
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
The specific intent required for attempt is simply the “intent to accomplish the acts that constitute the completed crime.” United States v. Sneezer, 900 F.2d 177, 180 (9th Cir.1990); see also United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 369 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1013 , 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jose Efrain Ibarra Cantellano
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have repeatedly rejected this argument and reasoned that the conclusion in Almendarez-Torres “was left undisturbed by Apprendi, Blakely, and Booker.” Shelton, 400 F.3d at 1329 ; accord United States v. Orduno-Mireles, 405 F.3d 960, 962 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Burge, 407 F.3d 1183, 1188 (11th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249, 1257 , 1257 n. 14 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1013 , 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004). “[A] district court does not err by relying on prior convictions to enhance a defendant’s sentence.” Shelton, 400 F.…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Bernard Cunningham
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 1228-29; see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249, 1257 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Francis Mackey Davison, III
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have held that “Almendarez-Torres remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almendarez-Torres is not controlling precedent.” United States v. Guadamuz-Solis, 232 F.3d 1363, 1363 (11th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249 , 1257 & n. 14 (11th Cir.) (refusing to interpret Apprendi as overruling the prior Supreme Court decision in AlmendarezTorres, and concluding that Blakely “does not take such fact-finding out of the hands of the courts”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Keidric Cook
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 523 U.S. at 247 , 118 S.Ct. at 1233 ; see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249, 1257 (11th Cir.) (discussing the Almendarez-Torres holding), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Davison
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
We have held that “Almendarez-Torres remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almendarez-Torres is not controlling precedent.” United States v. Guadamuz-Solis, 232 F.3d 1363, 1363 (11th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249 , 1257 & n. 14 (11th Cir.) (refusing to interpret Apprendi as overruling the prior Supreme Court decision in AlmendarezTorres, and concluding that Blakely “does not take such fact-finding out of the hands of the courts”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 637 , 160 L.Ed.2d 480 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Miguel Orduno-Mireles
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Put another way, because the prior-conviction exception remains undisturbed after Booker , a district court does not err by relying on prior convictions to enhance a defendant’s sentence. 3 *963 We have held that “Almendarez-Torres remains the law until the Supreme Court determines that Almendarez-Torres is not controlling precedent.” United States v. Guadamuz-Solis, 232 F.3d 1363, 1363 (11th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249 , 1257 & n. 14 (11th Cir.) (refusing to interpret Apprendi as overruling the prior Supreme Court decision in Almendarez-Torres, and conc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martinez-Martinez
v.
United States
04-6962.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 2004.
543 U.S. 1013
Published

543 U.S. 1013

MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 04-6962.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 29, 2004.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 369 F. 3d 1076.