Ventimiglia v. St. Louis Cnty., Missouri, 543 U.S. 1185 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Ventimiglia v. St. Louis Cnty., Missouri, 543 U.S. 1185 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Volodymyr Pavlyk, Natalia Pavlyk, and Iryna Pavlyk v. Alberto R. Gonzales (ca7, 2006-12-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Volodymyr Pavlyk, Natalia Pavlyk, and Iryna Pavlyk v. Alberto R. Gonzales
7th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (noting that the alien "made his views known within the chain of command, as part of his official duties," which was insufficient to constitute an expression of political opinion). 20 Furthermore, we previously noted that "[i]t is an open question even in the United States whether the first amendment gives public officials a right to be free of retaliation when they speak within an agency's hierarchy on an issue of public concern, as part of their duties." Id. (noting that the Supreme Court had granted certiorari in Garcetti v. Ceballos, 543 U.S. 1186 , 125 S.Ct. 1395 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188…
cited Cited "see" James E. Miller, Jr. v. Arthur L. Jones, Police Chief
7th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Cioffi v. Averill Park Central School District Board Of Ed.
2d Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Connick, 461 U.S. at 150-54 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 . 3 The Supreme Court's forthcoming decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos, cert. granted, 543 U.S. 1186 , 125 S.Ct. 1395 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005), as to whether the First Amendment protects an employee's purely job-related speech about a matter of public concern expressed pursuant to the duties of employment, does not affect the disposition of this case because the record here establishes that Cioffi's speech was not made strictly pursuant to his duties as a public employee.
discussed Cited "see" Thompson v. District of Columbia (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Garcetti v. Ceballos, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1395 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005) (granting cert. on this question), granting cert. to 361 F.3d 1168 (9th Cir.2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kesling v. Kesling
Ind. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Tracy, 948 N.E.2d at 866 ; see also Poppe v. Jabaay, 804 N.E.2d 789, 796 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (noting that rescission of a contract may be available in cases of "fraud, illegality, or mutual mistake"), trans. denied, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1164 , 125 S.Ct. 1333 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005); Franklin v. White, 493 N.E.2d 161 (Ind.1986) (holding rescission of contract proper after determination of mutual mistake of fact).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tarabochia v. Hill
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, that was clearly established at the time, and the Officers, as reasonable officials, should have understood that they were violating that right when they disciplined him. 2 See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 , 201-02, 121 S.Ct. 2151 , 2156, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001); Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 638-40 , 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3038-39 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987); Bahrampour v. Lampert, 356 F.3d 969, 976 (9th Cir.2004); see also Ceballos v. Garcetti, 361 F.3d 1168, 1180 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. granted, 543 U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1395 , 161 L.Ed.2d 188 (2005). (2) Tarabochia asks us to consider a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ventimiglia
v.
St. Louis County, Missouri, Et Al.
04-7036.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 2005.
543 U.S. 1185
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration[*1186] of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 1048] denied.