green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith v. District of Columbia
(2×)
Fredrick v. District of Columbia, 254 F.3d 156, 160 (D.C.Cir.2001); but see Unitherm Food Sys. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1396 , 161 L.Ed.2d 189 (Feb. 28, 2005) (No. 04-597) (granting certiorari to resolve the scope of an appellate court's review in such situations), granting cert. to 375 F.3d 1341 (Fed.Cir.2004).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Don Caldwell, Individually and Sheronda Caldwell, Individually v. St. Charles Gaming Company D/B/A Isle of Capri Casino-Lake Charles
Charles Gaming refers this court to other jurisprudence holding that, since the 2001 amendment to La.R.S. 27:65, Louisiana’s permanently moored casinos are not vessels in navigation for purposes of maritime jurisdiction: Martin v. Boyd Gaming Corp., 374 F.3d 375 (5th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct.1396, 161 L.Ed.2d 189 (2005); Hertz v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC, 274 F.Supp.2d 795 (E.D.La.2003); Bourgeois v. Boomtown, LLC, 2009 WL 5909119 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/21/09), writs denied, 09–1357 (La.9/25/09), 18 So.3d 68 ; cert. denied, 559 U.S. 972 , 130 S.Ct. 1699 , 176 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. TSOLAINOS
See State v. Tsolainos, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 1st Cir.12/31/03), 864 So.2d 905 (unpublished), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/2/04), 877 So.2d 144 , cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1186 , 125 S.Ct. 1395 , 161 L.Ed.2d 189 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Town of Homer v. UNITED HEALTHCARE OF LA.
See City of New Orleans v. Municipal Administrative Services, Inc., 376 F.3d 501 (5th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1396 , 161 L.Ed.2d 189 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur W. Fuesting v. Zimmer, Inc.
See Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 543 U.S. 1186 , 125 S.Ct. 1396 , 161 L.Ed.2d 189 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Unitherm Food Systems, Inc.
v.
Swift-Eckrich, Inc., Dba ConAgra Refrigerated Foods
v.
Swift-Eckrich, Inc., Dba ConAgra Refrigerated Foods
04-597.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 2005.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether, and to what extent, a court of appeals may review the sufficiency of evidence supporting a civil jury verdict where the party requesting review made a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure before submission of the case to the jury, but neither renewed that motion under Rule 50(b) after the jury’s verdict, nor moved for a new trial under Rule 59?”