Gen. Motors Corp. v. Ford, 546 U.S. 935 (2005). · Go Syfert
Gen. Motors Corp. v. Ford, 546 U.S. 935 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
69 citation events (69 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Li Neuroscience v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Of Fla. (nyed, 2019-02-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Li Neuroscience v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Of Fla.
E.D.N.Y · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dubin v. County of Nassau
E.D.N.Y · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of heir contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Flexborrow LLC v. TD Auto Finance LLC
E.D.N.Y · 2017 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed Cited "see" Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School District
9th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1212-13 . 1 Student cites to Adams, 195 F.3d at 1145, and Deal v. Hamilton County Bd. of Educ., 392 F.3d 840, 861-62 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 936 , 126 S.Ct. 422 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005), in support of a “meaningful” benefit standard.
discussed Cited "see" Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School District
9th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 1212-13 . 1 Student cites to Adams, 195 F.3d at 1145, and Deal v. Hamilton County Bd. of Educ., 392 F.3d 840, 861-62 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 936 , 126 S.Ct. 422 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005), in support of a “meaningful” benefit standard.
cited Cited "see" In Re Merrill Lynch Research Rpts. SEC. Lit.
S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lentell v. Merrill Lynch, 396 F.3d 161, 178 (2d Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 935 , 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (“Lentell”).
cited Cited "see" In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
D.N.J. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Sandip Shah v. Mary Meeker, Morgan Stanley & Co., Philip J. Purcell and Morgan Stanley, Docket No. 04-5965-Cv
2d Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cooper v. Parsley, 140 F.3d 433, 440 (2d Cir.1998). ‘Where inquiry notice is clearly established, dismissal of a securities-fraud complaint as untimely may be readily affirmed.” Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 168 (2d Cir.2005) (internal citation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (Mem.).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Strategies Fund, Ltd., 551 F.Supp.2d 210, 220 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (quotations and citations omitted); see also Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 396 F.3d 161, 172 (2d Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 935 , 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (plaintiffs must allege that the defendants “ ‘(1) made misstatements or omissions of material fact; (2) with scien-ter; (3) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities; (4) upon which plaintiffs relied; and (5) that plaintiffs’ reliance was the proximate cause of their injury.’ ” (quoting In re IBM Sec.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Cigna Corp. Securities Litigation
E.D. Pa. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 173-75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005); In re Tellium, Inc. Sec.
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative
unknown court · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 173 (2d Cir.2005), ce rt. denied, — U.S. ---, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Motors Corp.
v.
Ford, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
No. 05-39.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2005.
546 U.S. 935

Ct. Civ. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.