green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2017–2019 ·
…he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Li Neuroscience v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Of Fla.
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dubin v. County of Nassau
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of heir contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Flexborrow LLC v. TD Auto Finance LLC
he district court ... could have viewed on the motion to dismiss because there was undisputed notice to plaintiffs of their contents and they were integral to plaintiffs' claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School District
See id. at 1212-13 . 1 Student cites to Adams, 195 F.3d at 1145, and Deal v. Hamilton County Bd. of Educ., 392 F.3d 840, 861-62 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 936 , 126 S.Ct. 422 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005), in support of a “meaningful” benefit standard.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School District
See id. at 1212-13 . 1 Student cites to Adams, 195 F.3d at 1145, and Deal v. Hamilton County Bd. of Educ., 392 F.3d 840, 861-62 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 936 , 126 S.Ct. 422 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005), in support of a “meaningful” benefit standard.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Merrill Lynch Research Rpts. SEC. Lit.
See Lentell v. Merrill Lynch, 396 F.3d 161, 178 (2d Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 935 , 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (“Lentell”).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
See Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sandip Shah v. Mary Meeker, Morgan Stanley & Co., Philip J. Purcell and Morgan Stanley, Docket No. 04-5965-Cv
See Cooper v. Parsley, 140 F.3d 433, 440 (2d Cir.1998). ‘Where inquiry notice is clearly established, dismissal of a securities-fraud complaint as untimely may be readily affirmed.” Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 168 (2d Cir.2005) (internal citation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (Mem.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation
Strategies Fund, Ltd., 551 F.Supp.2d 210, 220 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (quotations and citations omitted); see also Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 396 F.3d 161, 172 (2d Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 935 , 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005) (plaintiffs must allege that the defendants “ ‘(1) made misstatements or omissions of material fact; (2) with scien-ter; (3) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities; (4) upon which plaintiffs relied; and (5) that plaintiffs’ reliance was the proximate cause of their injury.’ ” (quoting In re IBM Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Cigna Corp. Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 173-75 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005); In re Tellium, Inc. Sec.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative
See, e.g., Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161, 173 (2d Cir.2005), ce rt. denied, — U.S. ---, 126 S.Ct. 421 , 163 L.Ed.2d 321 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Motors Corp.
v.
Ford, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
v.
Ford, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
No. 05-39.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (3)
Ct. Civ. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.