green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Abu-Jamal v. Horn
Cf. Schriro, 127 S. Ct. 43 at 1942 (finding that the state court’s conclusion was not objectively unreasonable because the Supreme Court had “never addressed a situation like this”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. ApolloMD, Inc.
See Corsello v. Lincare, Inc., 428 F.3d 1008, 1014 (11th Cir.2005), reh'g & reh'g en banc denied, 167 F. App'x 170 (2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 810 , 127 S. Ct. 42 , 166 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Iraq Ex Rel. Citizens of the Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG
See Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of PSA Inc. v. Edwards, 437 F.3d 1145, 1152-56 (11th Cir.) (“Edwards”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 811 , 127 S.Ct. 45 , 166 L.Ed.2d 19 (2006); Rogers v. McDorman, 521 F.3d 381, 387-91 (5th Cir.2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moratzka v. Morris (In Re Senior Cottages of America, LLC)
Accord Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Edwards, 437 F.3d 1145, 1149-50 (11th Cir.2006) (holding that trustee had standing, but federal claim was barred by in pari delicto and state claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty was not cognizable under Georgia law), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 45 , 166 L.Ed.2d 19 (2006); Baena v. KPMG, LLP, 453 F.3d 1, 6-10 (1st Cir.2006) (trustee’s case barred by in pari delicto, but that doctrine “has nothing to do with Article III requirements”); O’Halloran v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 350 F.3d 1197 , 1203-04 (11th Cir.2003)…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Senior Cottages of America, Llc, Debtor. Timothy D. Moratzka, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Senior Cottages of America, LLC v. Richard Morris Morris, Carlson, Hoelscher, P.A.
Accord Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Edwards, 437 F.3d 1145, 1149-50 (11th Cir.2006) (holding that trustee had standing, but federal claim was barred by in pari delicto and state claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty was not cognizable under Georgia law), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 45 , 166 L.Ed.2d 19 (2006); Baena v. KPMG, LLP, 453 F.3d 1, 6-10 (1st Cir.2006) (trustee's case barred by in pari delicto, but that doctrine "has nothing to do with Article III requirements"); O'Halloran v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 350 F.3d 1197 , 1203-04 (11th Cir.2003) (corpor…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ahmed v. Mukasey
See INA § 242(a)(2)(D), 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D) (added by REAL ID Act § 106(a)); see also Hernandez-Castillo v. Moore, 436 F.3d 516, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 810 , 127 S.Ct. 40 , 166 L.Ed.2d 18 (2006); accord Toussaint v. Attorney Gen., 455 F.3d 409 , 412 n. 3 (3d Cir.2006) (stating that a petition for review filed in the appropriate court of appeals “is the sole and exclusive means for judicial review of any cause or claim under the [CAT] except as provided in subsection (e) of this section” but explaining that “jurisdiction extends only to constitutional claims and q…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. De Horta Garcia
(2×)
Id. ; see also Kelava v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 1120, 1124-25 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ____, 127 S.Ct. 43 , 166 L.Ed.2d 19 (2006) (coll. cases in the same vein); Van Wyke, 154 U. PA.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. De Horta Garcia, Jos
Id.; see also Kelava v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 1120, 1124-25 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 43 (2006) (coll. cases in the same vein); Van Wyke, 154 U. PA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camins v. Gonzales
In determining whether the attachment of new legal conse- quences to past actions conflicts with “familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations,” Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 270 , we require that reliance on the prior law “would have been objectively reasonable under the party’s circumstances.” Hernandez de Anderson v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, No. 05-74132, 2007 WL 2264698, at *10 (9th Cir. Aug. 9, 2007); see also Kelava v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 1120 , 1124-25 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2006) (as amended) (rejecting claim of non-retroactivity because no reliance in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camins v. Gonzales
(2×)
In determining whether the attachment of new legal consequences to past actions conflicts with “familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations,” Landgraf, 511 U.S. at 270 , 114 S.Ct. 1483 , we require that reliance on the prior law “would have been objectively reasonable under the party’s circumstances.” Hernandez de Anderson v. Gonzales, 497 F.3d 927 , No. 05-74132, 2007 WL 2264698, at *10 (9th Cir. Aug.9, 2007); see also Kelava v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 1120 , 1124-25 & n. 7 (9th Cir.2006) (as amended) (rejecting claim of non-retro-activity becaus…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BANCO PANAMERICANO, INC.
v.
CHASTANG LANDFILL, INC.
v.
CHASTANG LANDFILL, INC.
No. 05-1307.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Oct 2, 2006.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.