green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kroger Co. v. SANOFI-AVENTIS
Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc., 492 F.Supp.2d 353 (S.D.N.Y.2007), aff'd, 550 F.3d 1075 (Fed.Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 493 , 175 L.Ed.2d 346 *951 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co.
See Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc., 492 F.Supp.2d 353, 382 (S.D.N.Y.2007) (noting that a prior art reference “must be an enabling disclosure, rather than mere vague intimations of general ideas that may or may not be workable” (internal quotation marks omitted)), aff'd, 550 F.3d 1075 (Fed.Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 493 , 175 L.Ed.2d 346 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex Inc.
See Sanofi- *295 Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc., 492 F.Supp.2d 353 (S.D.N.Y.2007), aff'd, 550 F.3d 1075 (Fed.Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 493 , 175 L.Ed.2d 346 (2009). 1 The only aspect of this action that remains unresolved is the amount of damages to be awarded plaintiffs.
discussed
Cited "see"
Borgwarner, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.
See Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 1086 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“The determination of obviousness is made with respect to the subject matter as a whole, not separate pieces of the claim.”), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 493 , 175 L.Ed.2d 346 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
Alisha Stevenson v. FCI Waseca
See Gatewood v. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843, 848-49 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 558 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 490 , 175 L.Ed.2d 350 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
Handley v. Chapman
See Gatewood v. Outlaw, 560 F.3d 843 (8th Cir.2009), cert. denied - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 490 , - L.Ed.2d -, 2009 WL 1980050 (2009); Muolo v. Quintana, No. 09-1213, 2009 WL 3022150 , 2009 U.S.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 09-3.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 2009.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.